Page Weight Matters (2012)
blog.chriszacharias.com
Page Weight Matters (2012)
1–10 of 171 posts
Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#2Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#3WOW! Faster load times and lighter code makes for a better user experience? (mindblown)
Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#4Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#5Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#6https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simpson%27s_paradox
It also reminds me of the phenomenon, in customer service, whereby an increase in complaints can sometimes indicate success -- it means the product has gone from bad enough to be unnoticeable to good enough to be engaged with.
Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#7Have you ever seen something completely insane and everyone around doesn't seem to recognize how awful it really is. That is the web of today. 60-80 requests? 1MB+ single pages?
Your functionality, I don't care if its Facebook - does not need that much. It is not necessary. When broadband came on the scene, everyone started to ignore it, just like GBs of memory made people forget about conservation.
The fact that there isn't a daily drumbeat about how bloated, how needlessly complex, how ridicuous most of the world's web appliactions of today really are - baffles me.
Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#8WOW! Faster load times and lighter code makes for a better user experience? (mindblown)
whoosh! You missed the whole point.
Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#9Re: Page Weight Matters (2012)
#10I wonder what would happen if for example iOS decided to visually indicate page weight, kind of like how you can see which apps use the most energy.