Live data from Hacker News

Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

amny.com

61–70 of 106 posts

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#61
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You actually wrote two paragraphs to tell somebody they misspelled with an 'e' instead of an 'a'

I'm sure we've all wasted keystrokes on stupider things.

If you want a dose of your own medicine, "stupider" isn't a word. You're thinking of "more stupid".

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#62

Has anyone ever died because of an unlicensed limo? Is it really a threat to public safety? If consenting adults agree to a transaction, I am not sure how that's the government's business. However, if an unlicensed vehicle was portraying itself as a licensed vehicle, then you have a fraud issue, not a public safety one.

Some countries require health checks on drivers so they don't act as super spreaders.

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#63
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By "skirting around" do you mean "blatantly flouting"? Because that's the truth of it.. Uber, Lyft, et al are just central dispatch for gypsy cabs. I don't see any reason they shouldn't get massive fines or seized vehicles in all locales they operate.

Central dispatch for gypsy cabs? Are you trying to make a cogent argument? because all I see is a nasty insult. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

"Gypsy cab" is a slang term for an unlicensed taxi, and no longer has anything to do with the Romani people. It's not a term I personally use (outside a descriptive context like this), but it doesn't seem intended as an insult.

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It means you're using a bad ad blocker. Using uBlock origin it displays fine.

I had to disable my uBlock Origin in order to see the page

Just checked and it works fine using default settings. If you added more filter lists, the issue is likely caused by one of them.

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#65
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uber wasn't explicitly mentioned, but it just sounds like the TLC is overly trigger happy in seizing cars, presumably because of the uptake in services like Lyft and Uber who in the TLC's eyes are skirting around the law.

By "skirting around" do you mean "blatantly flouting"? Because that's the truth of it.. Uber, Lyft, et al are just central dispatch for gypsy cabs. I don't see any reason they shouldn't get massive fines or seized vehicles in all locales they operate.

> Uber, Lyft, et al are just central dispatch for gypsy cabs.

True fact: Every single Uber and Lyft vehicle which I've ridden in, in New York City, has a Taxi and Limo Commission plate on it in the T123456C format. The so-called "gypsy cab"+ market consists of the vehicles without those plates.

(+complete with casual old-fashioned ethnic slur)

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#66
post #63

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Central dispatch for gypsy cabs? Are you trying to make a cogent argument? because all I see is a nasty insult. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

"Gypsy cab" is a slang term for an unlicensed taxi, and no longer has anything to do with the Romani people. It's not a term I personally use (outside a descriptive context like this), but it doesn't seem intended as an insult.

Maybe not, but wouldn't it be better to avoid antiquated ethnic slurs like "Gypsy cab" in favor of cool neutral terms like "unlicensed"?

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#67
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Uber wasn't explicitly mentioned, but it just sounds like the TLC is overly trigger happy in seizing cars, presumably because of the uptake in services like Lyft and Uber who in the TLC's eyes are skirting around the law.

By "skirting around" do you mean "blatantly flouting"? Because that's the truth of it.. Uber, Lyft, et al are just central dispatch for gypsy cabs. I don't see any reason they shouldn't get massive fines or seized vehicles in all locales they operate.

Based on your racist and derogatory statements, I have to wonder if you're involved in the taxi industry.

The fact is, taxi lobbies are just protection rackets. I don't like Uber at all due to the way they treat their customers and drivers, but ridesharing is the future and the taxi mob is desperate to stop them from growing. If that means paying off the local law enforcement and city officials to illegally and unconstitutionally seize law abiding citizens' vehicles (including regular folks dropping off or picking up family and friends, which boggles the mind), they will do it.

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#68
post #47

Earlier quoted context omitted.

By "skirting around" do you mean "blatantly flouting"? Because that's the truth of it.. Uber, Lyft, et al are just central dispatch for gypsy cabs. I don't see any reason they shouldn't get massive fines or seized vehicles in all locales they operate.

Based on your racist and derogatory statements, I have to wonder if you're involved in the taxi industry. The fact is, taxi lobbies are just protection rackets. I don't like Uber at all due to the way they treat their customers and drivers, but ridesharing is the future and the taxi mob is desperate to stop them from growing. If that means paying off the local law enforcement and city officials to illegally and uncon…

The problem is that even if you can't own a person wholesale anymore in this country, you can own the right to be the sole provider of one type of service to that person, and charge them exorbitant rates. To the taxi lobby, the citizens of New York are not free men, but their property as customers. Uber and the like are therefore dirty thieves, abolitionist usurpers.

The taxi lobby will also say that it's all for your own safety, even as unlicensed taxi drivers in licensed cabs proliferate. (fun story: I've had colleagues whose luggage was held hostage while driven to an ATM because the driver didn't want card payment because he wasn't driving the cab legally. good luck pursuing recourse for that.)

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#69
post #49

This is a stupid grammar nitpick I only offer in the hopes that you find it useful for your writing. No dismissal of your arguments or denigration of your character is intended. I think you want the word "affected" in your second paragraph. Effects are the result of causation, whereas affect refers to the causation. The citizens were affected by the effects of this policy.

Contrary to the opinions of others, I appreciated your post. While a nitpick, you provided the both the correction and a good way to remember which word is used in which situation. As someone who has to stop to consider which one to use sometimes, I appreciate the extra effort.

Re: Judge: NYC Seizing Thousands of Cars Without Warrants Is Unconstitutional

#70
post #56

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You actually wrote two paragraphs to tell somebody they misspelled with an 'e' instead of an 'a'

I'm sure we've all wasted keystrokes on stupider things.

Stupider yes, more patronising perhaps not.
Post reply on HN