Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
nytimes.com
Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
1–10 of 78 posts
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#2Oof.
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#3Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#4It brings “a very passionate audience of millennial males into our roster,” he said. Oof.
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#5I hope they continue to put out good reviews of great music. As long as they do that, I'll be happy.
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#6It brings “a very passionate audience of millennial males into our roster,” he said. Oof.
Source: I live in Brooklyn.
(This post made with tongue firmly in cheek, of course. By virtue of the fact that I know about it, it can't possibly be hipster enough.)
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#7Is Pitchfork still cool with hipsters?
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#8I'm disappointed because since the Conde Nast takeover of Ars Technica, it has gone steeply down hill. I imagine the fans of Pitchfork will go through a similar experience over the next few years.
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#9http://pitchfork.com/artists/3512-radiohead/
The classic is the Kid A one: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/6656-kid-a/
Boomkat is a close second, but at least theyre trying to sell the records: https://twitter.com/boomkat_ebooks
Re: Condé Nast Buys Pitchfork Media
#10For a taste of the archetypical pitchfork style, read any of their radiohead reviews: http://pitchfork.com/artists/3512-radiohead/ The classic is the Kid A one: http://pitchfork.com/reviews/albums/6656-kid-a/ Boomkat is a close second, but at least theyre trying to sell the records: https://twitter.com/boomkat_ebooks
(IMHO, their earlier reviews generally were of lower quality than their more recent ones, and they've benefited from discarding/discouraging the more experimental/informal review formats. The irony of this sentence being a hipster antithesis does not escape me.)