Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
billthelizard.com
Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
1–10 of 21 posts
Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#2Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#3Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#4That was pretty simple. See also this fun post of mine: http://www.jgc.org/blog/2008/02/sum-of-first-n-odd-numbers-i...
I think I like the image you used to visualize the relationship a little bit better than the one I used.
Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#5 Permutations and combinations.
Taking 3 (visualized as dimensions) from 7 (length of side).
License: Public domain. Attribution requested.
KEY:
Permutation: (order matters).
Repeating (Sequence): All (little cubies). Eg: Passwords.
Non-repeating (Arrangement): All except the reds. (ie transparent + blues). Eg: Number of ways of podium finishes in a race.
Combination: Selection (order doesn't matter).
Repeating: Cubies with white outline. Eg: Number of 3 scoop icecream serving from a set of flavours.
Non-repeating (Subset combination): The blues. Eg: Number of ways to choose 3 member committies from a group.Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#6Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#7I have been collecting visual proofs for over a year now. I think I am gonna start writing an article series about math visualizations.
Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#8Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#9I have been collecting visual proofs for over a year now. I think I am gonna start writing an article series about math visualizations.
I keep meaning to write more of these too. My blog is (ostensibly) about programming, but I find that I keep drifting further and further into mathematical topics without tying them back into programming somehow. I should probably commit to one or the other, I just can't decide.
Re: Math visualization: (x + 1)^2
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
I keep meaning to write more of these too. My blog is (ostensibly) about programming, but I find that I keep drifting further and further into mathematical topics without tying them back into programming somehow. I should probably commit to one or the other, I just can't decide.
You don't need to. There are surprising connections. E.g. between partial differentiation and algebraic datatypes: http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Haskell/Zippers#Differentiation...