Earlier quoted context omitted.
why would they even risk it at all? So, you're saying terrorism works. It's ok to offend groups who don't resort to terrorism to destroy freedom of speech. That Google operates censorship in China and India is bad enough. Now you're saying the number 1 search engine in the west is right to censor.
I'm not saying terrorism works. I'm just saying Google is not a non profit organisation promoting free speech.
Google has chosen to position itself as an ethical company. Google's motto is "do no evil". They want us to think they enshrine all that is good.
Discriminating in favour of irrational and violent religious fundamentalists is evil.