Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
highline.huffingtonpost.com
Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
1–10 of 145 posts
Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#2Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#3This looks interesting and I'll bookmark it for later. Does anyone happen to have a TL;DL version for those who don't currently have time to read the whole thing right now?
The Food and Drug Administration had prohibited Johnson & Johnson salespeople from trying to promote Risperdal to doctors to treat children because of its feared side effects, including hormonal disorders. The company was also not allowed to promote it to treat the elderly except for the most serious psychotic disorders; it was thought to cause strokes, diabetes and other ailments in that population. But [...] Johnson & Johnson was reaping more than half of its Risperdal sales from prescriptions written for children to alleviate all kinds of behavior disorders, and for the elderly, who were given the drug for simple symptoms of dementia or restlessness.
Johnson & Johnson emails, sales training manuals and business plans produced as evidence in the case revealed that the company organized special sales units illegally targeting doctors who treated the elderly and children. State mental institutions treating children, whose drugs would be paid for by Medicaid, were targeted, too.
When it came time to explain their conduct at trials and to federal investigators, Johnson & Johnson executives and salespeople have unwaveringly, even indignantly, defended themselves. One salesman, who otherwise fit the salt-of-the-earth mold that R.W. Johnson had envisioned for his company’s employees, gave thousands of Risperdal samples in child-sized doses to Austin Pledger’s doctor in Birmingham, Alabama. Yet he insisted under oath in February he didn’t recall stepping around kiddie furniture and toys as he walked into an office with a sign that said “pediatric neurologist,” and that he had no way of knowing that the doctor wasn’t treating adults.
Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#4Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#5A list of the $13B in fines paid by pharma companies just in 2009 to 2014: http://projects.propublica.org/graphics/bigpharma
Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#6> “All the big pharmas have lawsuits,” the analyst concluded, sipping an espresso. “It’s just not a big deal.” A list of the $13B in fines paid by pharma companies just in 2009 to 2014: http://projects.propublica.org/graphics/bigpharma
Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#7On topic (again only got through chapter 1) I hope that J&J, or better yet those actual PEOPLE, that were involved get punished. And not the that's the cost of doing business punished. I doubt it but one can hope.
Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#8Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#9I myself am an anti-anti-vaxxer (a pro-vaxxer?) who actually supports state-mandated vaccinations, but this puts me in the very uncomfortable position of having to defend one corner of an industry that does the kinds of things described here and a government that has failed at the most basic oversight.
So the next time you read about a measles outbreak at a theme park or you see a scientifically illiterate ghoul like Jenny McCarthy peddling her child-killing nonsense on TV, spare a thought for Johnson & Johnson, because they're feeding the anti-vaxxer paranoia and kneecapping legitimate public health efforts.
Re: Johnson and Johnson, America’s Most Admired Lawbreaker
#10The tragedy here goes far beyond the direct damage to the patents who were prescribed this vile stuff off-label. There's also the collateral damage to the medical establishment that supports this -- can anyone argue that the anti-vaxxers don't have a point when they're on about exactly this sort of profit-driven evil from Big Pharma? I myself am an anti-anti-vaxxer (a pro-vaxxer?) who actually supports state-mandated…
I am not an anti-vaxxer. I was vaccinated. I had my children vaccinated.
I just hold the position that the power of the state shouldn't be used to compel people to inject substances into their bodies, even if we think we have a good reason for doing it.
I'm not looking to delve too deeply into the politics of it but there are good reasons to oppose mandatory vaccinations.