Live data from Hacker News

How Will We Get Off Mars?

news.nationalgeographic.com

11–20 of 71 posts

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#11
post #7

That MAV experience does not sound appealing at all. 43 hours, standing up, no food, no toilet, no sitting down, no stretching your limbs. Riding on top of a metal rocket. Surrounded by millions of miles of lethal void.

Sounds similar enough to some bus rides I've taken across Asia.

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#12
post #10
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Is muscle wasting a significant issue? Mars does have gravity, the people will no doubt be doing some physical work, so it won't be as bad as in orbit. On top of that, if they have no plans for ever coming back to Earth, then is there a significant downside to at least some atrophy?

It's true that exercise does limit the loss and I guess you are right that it won't matter if you stay there. I suppose we just don't have enough data to say one way or the other. Edit: an old Nasa article on the topic... http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/as...

Correct. We know some things about how bad zero gravity is, we do not know how bad microgravity is. Given that it's probably a range (one presumes that .98G is probably medically indistinguishable from 1G, one presumes .02G is very like 0G though perhaps not quite indistinguishable), it's probably fair to say we are comprehensively ignorant.

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#13

It's only when you realise that getting off Mars is far more like getting off Earth than getting off the Moon, that the full rationale behind SpaceX's obsession with a re-usable launch vehicle rocket that can land itself, becomes apparent.

Is the assumption there that a Falcon 9 lands vertically and a Dragon (or equivalent) is the ascent vehicle? Still doesn't really address the business of manufacturing the fuel or getting it into the rocket. Nor, indeed, the matter of lifting a Dragon 60m into the air to integrate it back onto its launcher.

So much Earth infrastructure we depend on for this stuff.

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#15

It's only when you realise that getting off Mars is far more like getting off Earth than getting off the Moon, that the full rationale behind SpaceX's obsession with a re-usable launch vehicle rocket that can land itself, becomes apparent.

Eh - I'd say that it's pretty even. It takes about twice as much delta-v to get into low martian orbit as low lunar orbit, which is still less than half what it takes to get into low earth orbit. Earth has a lot of gravity and a lot of atmosphere, which is nice for living there but a real pain in the ass when you're trying to leave.

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#16

It's only when you realise that getting off Mars is far more like getting off Earth than getting off the Moon, that the full rationale behind SpaceX's obsession with a re-usable launch vehicle rocket that can land itself, becomes apparent.

Is the assumption there that a Falcon 9 lands vertically and a Dragon (or equivalent) is the ascent vehicle? Still doesn't really address the business of manufacturing the fuel or getting it into the rocket. Nor, indeed, the matter of lifting a Dragon 60m into the air to integrate it back onto its launcher. So much Earth infrastructure we depend on for this stuff.

> ..lifting a Dragon 60m into the air to integrate it back onto its launcher.

Why would you need to do that? Why not land the Falcon (Edit: Actually, it might be a Raptor) with the Dragon already on top of it?

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#17
post #9

I always thought that the Lunar Module† was the single coolest piece of technology of the Apollo program. (Sorry Saturn V, raw power doesn’t really do it for me and beyond that you are mostly … boring.) It’s such an astonishing accomplishment to build something so lightweight, so complex, so versatile in such a short amount of time. It’s astonishing that it came together at all. And worked! Every single time, even be…

I'd never thought about a favorite piece of Apollo tech, but you make a strong case: the LM is pretty amazing.

The MAV will have to do all that and a lot more besides, and in a much bigger gravity well, and with an atmosphere, and for a multi-year period in an incredibly hostile, dusty environment.

EDIT: Actually, I had a favorite - the F1 engine. I find the idea of needing an auxiliary gas generator rocket engine inside just to turn a fuel pump pretty amazing. Likely I'm a bit more impressed by raw power than you :)

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#18

It's only when you realise that getting off Mars is far more like getting off Earth than getting off the Moon, that the full rationale behind SpaceX's obsession with a re-usable launch vehicle rocket that can land itself, becomes apparent.

I've always wondered why don't they allow the testing of those rockets in stable ground? We've done crazier tests, like nuclear testing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#19

It's only when you realise that getting off Mars is far more like getting off Earth than getting off the Moon, that the full rationale behind SpaceX's obsession with a re-usable launch vehicle rocket that can land itself, becomes apparent.

I've always wondered why don't they allow the testing of those rockets in stable ground? We've done crazier tests, like nuclear testing: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LLCF7vPanrY

I thought the reason involved the FAA requiring SpaceX's to prove that the first stage could be guided accurately to the general pad area instead of plowing into a populated region. Landing on a barge out at sea reduces the risk of the latter.

Re: How Will We Get Off Mars?

#20
post #2

I think the first humans on mars will go with the understanding that it's a one-way trip. And there will no doubt be people willing to sign on for that.

I think the first humans to go to the red planet will actually orbit and not touch down. They will stay in orbit and either pilot robots on the ground or study what happens to the body during long space flight. This will help future space faring people that visit Mars and beyond.

I don't know about that. I think that would be a pretty big waste of time and resources. We're already controlling robots on Mars from Earth and anything they would be wanting to test on the body could be done in Earth's orbit.

I'm also fairly certain they're already quite knowledgeable regarding the effects of weak gravity on the human body.

Post reply on HN