Earlier quoted context omitted.
Another reason is that playing DraftKings or FanDuel does actually make watching football more interesting- you care about games you otherwise wouldn't care about. Many people will happily continue to lose $10/week for the benefit of enjoying watching the NFL more. Online poker isn't as fun when you're consistently losing money- there's no "outside" benefit.
Putting $100 on a specific football match at 1.5% rake is both more fun and more profitable than DraftKings/FanDuel.
Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
61–70 of 111 posts
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
The advantage is in knowing what percentage of football players are started by the entire pool entrants. This information is released once that particular game is started (e.g. % start for NY Giants players would be known to all at 1 PM when their game started and % start for Denver Broncos players would be released at 4PM when that game started), but was known ahead of time by those who worked for the company. While…
But if you follow that strategy you might have a +EV but you are very very likely to lose in any given entry because you only win when all (or most of) your high variance players come through. And that is, by definition, unlikely. So this guy won big the first time he tried this? Or maybe he's tried 4 weeks now and has already won big? This still doesn't add up.
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
The advantage is in knowing what percentage of football players are started by the entire pool entrants. This information is released once that particular game is started (e.g. % start for NY Giants players would be known to all at 1 PM when their game started and % start for Denver Broncos players would be released at 4PM when that game started), but was known ahead of time by those who worked for the company. While…
But if you follow that strategy you might have a +EV but you are very very likely to lose in any given entry because you only win when all (or most of) your high variance players come through. And that is, by definition, unlikely. So this guy won big the first time he tried this? Or maybe he's tried 4 weeks now and has already won big? This still doesn't add up.
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#64The rake is so high on these sites (10%) that it's pretty much a scam whether they're pulling tricks like this or not.
Not necessarily disagreeing or agreeing with you about 10% of rake being a scam.
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#65Even if it were hidden from the public, it's fairly straightforward to reason that it is stored in a database and that at least one employee has read-access to that database. I would be more fascinated to learn that no DraftKings or FanDuel employee ever played DFS without at least looking at their own ownership data.
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#66As someone who worked in the Internet gambling industry and has to sit and see these Daily Fantasy Sports idiots run their loophole into the ground, I can only laugh. You can't flout your "legality" in front of a bunch of US Senators, advertise fraudulent returns, and have zero regulations and expect to get away with it.
I used to think this exactly...but now, given how heavily the NFL, NFLPA, and individual teams have been promoting Draftkings/FanDuel, it's obvious that the business model involves paying kickbacks to all the important stakeholders in the sport. And regarding how relatively chummy the NFL is with elected officials, don't forget that commissioner Roger Goddell's father was both a senator and representative from NY sta…
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
But if you follow that strategy you might have a +EV but you are very very likely to lose in any given entry because you only win when all (or most of) your high variance players come through. And that is, by definition, unlikely. So this guy won big the first time he tried this? Or maybe he's tried 4 weeks now and has already won big? This still doesn't add up.
You can enter multiple times I believe with different lineups. So you enter some lineups with high variance low % picked players.
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#68As someone who worked in the Internet gambling industry and has to sit and see these Daily Fantasy Sports idiots run their loophole into the ground, I can only laugh. You can't flout your "legality" in front of a bunch of US Senators, advertise fraudulent returns, and have zero regulations and expect to get away with it.
Daily Fantasy Sports probably wont go the way of poker for a couple of reasons: 1. DraftKings and FanDual are US based companies, most of the big poker sites were not. 2. There is an exception for fantasy sports in the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act. You can debate whether Daily Fantasy Sports should qualify, but unlike poker it is at least starting on legal ground. 3. Daily Fantasy Sports has buyins from…
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#69As far as I know, ownership percentage is available for any player in your lineup as soon as the first game begins. In other words, this is information is already public. That's what makes threads like this possible: http://reddit.com/r/dfsports/comments/3n1cdu/fanduel_percent... Even if it were hidden from the public, it's fairly straightforward to reason that it is stored in a database and that at least one employe…
Except it's useless at that point because you can't change your lineup. The employee has the ownership percentage stats before anyone else and before the first game begins and can use it to craft his lineup.
Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information
#701)players construct their line-ups and have a local program compute a secure hash of it (with some player specific data in it like arbitrary 10 digit number at the start)
2)only hashes are posted before the game starts (or once a deadline for submissions is reached or w/e)
3)then a player is allowed to post a matching (to the hash) line-up
Failing to do 3) results in a loss.
Are there any problems with that solution?