Live data from Hacker News

Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

nytimes.com

21–30 of 111 posts

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#21
post #15

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"The data that DraftKings acknowledged was released by its employee, Ethan Haskell, showed what particular players were most used in all lineups submitted to the site’s Millionaire Maker contests. Usually, that data is not released until the lineups for all games are finalized. Getting it early, however, is of great advantage to make tactical decisions, especially when your opponents do not have the information at al…

so he was trying to bet on which way the odds would be placed and get in ahead of that, with some sort of hedging that would work regardless of how the games turned out? i have a feeling there's some key insight i'm missing here - is this like placing a bet on a dark horse before the public catches on and the odds swing closer to even?

That's what my understanding is, although there's a lot more informed analysis in this thread now.

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#22
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why? Are they cheating their customers?

In this case, one of their employees did exactly that.

Arguably they cheated the players of the other site... As the employees were (rightly) banned from playing the site they were employed by.

That said they acted on knowledge not everyone would have. Similar to inside trading, but not the same due the unregulated nature of these sites. I'm not exactly sure what laws that would bump up against, but definitely most important to these sites who are trying to build consumer trust.

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#23
post #8

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Even with that, you'd still have to be good enough to pick the best roster. I don't think it's as useful as the article makes it sound.

Huh? You just use the company's internal pricing model and use it on other sites once you know discrepancies. It's not "simple" but it's not genius level derivatives trading, either.

What? I can see the prices of players on DraftKings and other sites as a player. That "internal pricing model" is public knowledge.

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#24
I hope DraftKings and FanDuel followed the advice of a post on HN a few days ago [1] and made (i.e., didn't re-invest) some money along the way. Something tells me they're going the way of online poker in the US very soon.

[1]: https://medium.com/@dhh/making-money-along-the-way-did-dropb...

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#25

As someone who worked in the Internet gambling industry and has to sit and see these Daily Fantasy Sports idiots run their loophole into the ground, I can only laugh. You can't flout your "legality" in front of a bunch of US Senators, advertise fraudulent returns, and have zero regulations and expect to get away with it.

I used to think this exactly...but now, given how heavily the NFL, NFLPA, and individual teams have been promoting Draftkings/FanDuel, it's obvious that the business model involves paying kickbacks to all the important stakeholders in the sport.

And regarding how relatively chummy the NFL is with elected officials, don't forget that commissioner Roger Goddell's father was both a senator and representative from NY state. That's just one data point, but there are probably a lot of backroom conversations that we don't know about. I think there's too much legitimate money at stake for there to be a online poker-like, "Black Friday" type event for the daily fantasy scam.

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#26
post #19
post #4

someone please explain like i'm five - according to the wikipedia page, fantasy football scoring is based on the actual performance of the athletes you pick in an actual game. therefore, if the games themselves are not fixed, there should be no possibility of "insider information" - what information could the companies running the pool have that the general public do not? the article didn't make it any clearer.

The advantage is in knowing what percentage of football players are started by the entire pool entrants. This information is released once that particular game is started (e.g. % start for NY Giants players would be known to all at 1 PM when their game started and % start for Denver Broncos players would be released at 4PM when that game started), but was known ahead of time by those who worked for the company. While…

[deleted]

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#27
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh? You just use the company's internal pricing model and use it on other sites once you know discrepancies. It's not "simple" but it's not genius level derivatives trading, either.

What? I can see the prices of players on DraftKings and other sites as a player. That "internal pricing model" is public knowledge.

Those are the advertised pricing for players. If you do not believe that these companies have a private, internal model to set those "prices" to maximize their returns...

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#28
post #8
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

From the article: The data that DraftKings acknowledged was released by its employee, Ethan Haskell, showed what particular players were most used in all lineups submitted to the site’s Millionaire Maker contests. Usually, that data is not released until the lineups for all games are finalized. Getting it early, however, is of great advantage to make tactical decisions, especially when your opponents do not have the…

Even with that, you'd still have to be good enough to pick the best roster. I don't think it's as useful as the article makes it sound.

Except Draft Kings lets you enter 1,000 games per week so one can use portfolio theory with this information to increase the expected value of playing.

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#29
post #9

Earlier quoted context omitted.

so it's basically using the "wisdom of the crowds" that play on the DraftKings site to put together a really good pick? that still seems like it shouldn't count as equivalent to insider information, because it's aggregating a bunch of guesses that have no information either.

No. If 60% of people pick Player X, his value goes down. This is parimutuel betting. You don't want significant overlap if you can help it; how would you beat the crowd otherwise? You find outliers and apply a pricing model that finds the best gaps. The information is incredibly valuable. Take it from someone who did this for a living at one point.

This isn't quite parimutuel, because in that system all the bet totals are published in nearly-real-time. If you wait until 1 MTP to place your bet you have a very good idea what the odds will be. It isn't obvious to me why the sports gambling sites need to keep this information secret, other than to create exploitable situations like those described in TFA.

Re: Fantasy Sports Employees Bet at Rival Sites Using Inside Information

#30
post #23

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Huh? You just use the company's internal pricing model and use it on other sites once you know discrepancies. It's not "simple" but it's not genius level derivatives trading, either.

What? I can see the prices of players on DraftKings and other sites as a player. That "internal pricing model" is public knowledge.

The controversy isn't about knowing player price points. That's like the gameboard and it's known to everyone. It's about knowing ownership percentages - which is the overall percentage of lineups in a contest that drafted a certain player.

That info gets published once the contest starts (it's very compelling data), but having access to that ahead of time is the equivalent of insider trading - because you have knowledge other people don't have when they make their picks, which provides you a completely unfair advantage.

Post reply on HN