21–26 of 26 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
You've posted several random comments about Steve Jobs that have nothing to do with this article. Those are not substantive comments. We don't need an "I love Steve" vs. "I hate Steve" discussion here—as generic as it is tedious.
Random?
Although the tabloid could hardly have framed this article in a viler way, what Brennan actually wrote is reflective and poignant and deserves to be read. If there's another URL we can switch to, we'd be happy to (I tried but couldn't find one). If you comment on this article, please be charitable and please stick to what's interesting about it.
I do not understand the need to be charitable to Steve Jobs. If he was not the brilliant leader of Apple we would simply say he was a douche bag. Just because he was great in one area does not excuse behaviour in another. Is there any level of business achievement that says that it is ok to have millions whilst the mother of your daughter is struggling to survive whilst bringing up your daughter? As a business man he…
Just checking: You know that a bunch of people took Nazi propaganda, changed the word "Jew" to "migrant", and posted it to the Daily Mail comment section, and that those comments were upvoted by DM readers? https://medium.com/@bestofthemail/i-was-upvoted-for-posting-... And, scarily, the Nazi propaganda was mild in contrast to other comments openly calling for the murder of migrants? Look at the upvotes on these comm…
I am probably missing something, but I take it you're okay with The Guardian as a source? How is this not clickbait? https://twitter.com/somuchguardian
Sadly, one thing the original commentor(commentator?) seem to not understand that it's about what's being said, rather than who's saying it.
He was a disgusting person to have treated people this way. It's mildly annoying that he was also brilliant because people end up rationalizing his faults away.