Live data from Hacker News

Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

businessinsider.com

141–150 of 174 posts

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#141
post #93

Curious why I can't offload this task to a DNS server? If such a solution truly doesn't exist (and I don't mean OpenDNS), would anyone like to talk about building something like that?

Would putting it on the DNS work as expected? Hypothetical Example: Two websites have google ads WebsiteA and WebsiteB. I want to support websiteA by allowing google ads on there but not on WebsiteB. The only way to allow google ads to WebsiteA would be from the DNS which would also allow google ads to WebsiteB.

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#142
post #29

It would be unbelievably obvious, yet ironic, if the "anonymous" buyer of Adblock ended up being an ad company. Why else would they want to remain anonymous?

Like what happened to AdBlockPlus, now being owned by UnitedInternet, the company that invented BinLayer (in-page pop-ups)?

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#143

"Adblock Plus to Allow Independent Board to Decide Which Ads Are `Acceptable’ - Parent company Eyeo says it will no longer help decide which ads can pass through its filters" http://www.wsj.com/articles/adblock-plus-to-allow-independen... https://acceptableads.org/

Right, because after making 30 million US$ with their "Acceptable Ads" program, they’re set for life: http://www.mobilegeeks.de/adblock-plus-zahltag-30-mio-von-am...

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#144
post #93

Curious why I can't offload this task to a DNS server? If such a solution truly doesn't exist (and I don't mean OpenDNS), would anyone like to talk about building something like that?

> Curious why I can't offload this task to a DNS server? DNS doesn't provide nearly enough precision for ad blocking. Many servers serve both ads and content. Random example: some sites host actual non-ad video content on doubleclick.

Could you point me to an example of non-ad content doubleclick hosts? I haven’t ever seen such content before.

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#145

Having been using Adblock for Safari for some time now, I'm a little apprehensive about this development. Thankfully, Adblock Plus (see above - distinct from Adblock) exists for Safari: https://adblockplus.org/en/safari Duly switched over.

AdBlock Plus does the same stuff, you might consider switching to uBlock for Safari.

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#146
post #91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

uBlock 0.9.5.2 is available for Safari. It looks an awful lot like µBlock Origin on Chrome.

I know uBlock has a version for Safari, which I mentioned in my comment. However, uBlock Origin does not, which I also mentioned. Is there something unclear about what I said above? Both uBlock Origin and uBlock have similar code bases because they were "born" from the original uBlock (now called uBlock Origin).

Probably that there's a difference between uBlock and uBlock Origin.

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#147
post #9

To anyone who is concerned by this change, I recommend taking a look at μBlock Origin [1,2]. It's blazingly fast, very flexible, and under active development. I made the switch about a year ago and it has served me very well. [1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock [2] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublock-origin/cjpa...

Just be sure NOT to install "U Block For Origin", by www.z1z2z3z4.com, which is currently the top hit if you search the Chrome extensions store for 'ublock'. I don't know what it does, but I bet it's not good.

Frigging Google and it's shitty app stores.

Re: Adblock Sold to Mystery Company

#150
post #76
post #9

To anyone who is concerned by this change, I recommend taking a look at μBlock Origin [1,2]. It's blazingly fast, very flexible, and under active development. I made the switch about a year ago and it has served me very well. [1] https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock [2] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublock-origin/cjpa...

or just stay with Adblock Plus which isn't affected by this change...

why the downvote?
Post reply on HN