If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
mrmoneymustache.com
If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
1–10 of 17 posts
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#2Reminds me a lot of:
>> "Economically, you can think of a startup as a way to compress your whole working life into a few years. Instead of working at a low intensity for forty years, you work as hard as you possibly can for four." [1]
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#3Exactly, so waste it working yourself to the bone instead of actually living.
> There’s plenty of room at the edges for laughs over fine tequila and winks over surreptitious servings of weed.
When, you just advocated staying up until 2:30am or 6:00am working.
> All the hard workers already run their own company.
Arrogant dick.
> Luckily, this is a happy situation and something to celebrate rather than dread. Doing your ultimate work is the core of human satisfaction
If you want to be a workaholic or are defined by your job, sure.
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#4 (money,skills,love/sex/friendships,experience,awareness)
if you're placing money ahead of any of the other 4 -- or defining being "rich" in strictly monetary terms, at any age -- you're doing it very wrong, indeed.Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#5He talks about "These days, kids tend to happen in your thirties." That tends to work fine if you are male. If you are female, it gets vastly more complicated to put off kids until after age thirty. I have to wonder how old his wife was when they started having kids. Most hetero relationships tend to be older man, younger woman. Men can easily put off becoming a parent until their thirties, in part by marrying a younger woman. That works less well if you are female.
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#6Except, well, this is all either not true or overgeneralized.
1) Your brain was more sponge-like an inexhaustible in your teens than your twenties, and more in the decade before that than in your teens.
2) I'm 42. I was more motivated and less cynical in my 30s than my 20s. I'm more motivated and less cynical now than in my 30s.
3) I'm 42. My first child will (if all goes well) be born sometime around the end of this year. I'm pretty sure that means I had "another decade of pre-childraising freedom" after my 20s. (OTOH, lots of people don't have a decade of pre-childraising freedom in their 20s.)
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#7If you are woman and want kids, biologically speaking, your twenties are the best time to make that happen. He talks about "These days, kids tend to happen in your thirties." That tends to work fine if you are male. If you are female, it gets vastly more complicated to put off kids until after age thirty. I have to wonder how old his wife was when they started having kids. Most hetero relationships tend to be older m…
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#8If you are woman and want kids, biologically speaking, your twenties are the best time to make that happen. He talks about "These days, kids tend to happen in your thirties." That tends to work fine if you are male. If you are female, it gets vastly more complicated to put off kids until after age thirty. I have to wonder how old his wife was when they started having kids. Most hetero relationships tend to be older m…
Doesn't the rate of birth defects start to rise quickly as the man ages into their 30s?
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#9The author of the referenced article makes the point that there is more to being young than saving money. Mr. Money Mustache counters that if you don't worry about saving money when you're young, you'll have less of it when you're older. These two opinions are in violent agreement! It's almost a tautology.
Re: If You’re Not Getting Rich in Your 20s, You’re Doing It Wrong
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Doesn't the rate of birth defects start to rise quickly as the man ages into their 30s?
My understanding: Yes, older men do see some increase in things like that. But it is a much bigger problem in women, for a long list of reasons. For example, women are born with all the eggs they will ever have. Sperm is produced "fresh." Also, the woman is the incubator.