Live data from Hacker News

Visualizing the Shrinking Sea Ice

theatlantic.com

1–10 of 35 posts

Re: Visualizing the Shrinking Sea Ice

#5
post #4

At the same time (well, within a couple of years) antarctic sea ice is at record high levels https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp...

...which, as the article notes, is not necessarily good news: the southern ocean is warming.

Re: Visualizing the Shrinking Sea Ice

#6
post #4

At the same time (well, within a couple of years) antarctic sea ice is at record high levels https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/capital-weather-gang/wp...

...which, as the article notes, is not necessarily good news: the southern ocean is warming.

What I got out of it is what I usually see with my attempts at being objective; we know this is happening, we don't fully understand why, and we don't fully know the pros and cons. There are guesses and theories, many of which I'm sympathetic to, that too many people are willing to move forward without being cautious.

Re: Visualizing the Shrinking Sea Ice

#7
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...which, as the article notes, is not necessarily good news: the southern ocean is warming.

What I got out of it is what I usually see with my attempts at being objective; we know this is happening, we don't fully understand why, and we don't fully know the pros and cons. There are guesses and theories, many of which I'm sympathetic to, that too many people are willing to move forward without being cautious.

The house is burning down, and we should be cautious?!

Re: Visualizing the Shrinking Sea Ice

#10
post #6

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...which, as the article notes, is not necessarily good news: the southern ocean is warming.

What I got out of it is what I usually see with my attempts at being objective; we know this is happening, we don't fully understand why, and we don't fully know the pros and cons. There are guesses and theories, many of which I'm sympathetic to, that too many people are willing to move forward without being cautious.

I dunno, billions of people seem perfectly willing to "move forward" with burning fossil fuels even when we don't fully understand its pros and cons. (I also use a gas heater and conventional vehicles, so I guess I'm one of them.)

Or does it not count as "moving forward" when we've been doing it for decades and there's a multi-billion-dollar industry that's interested in keeping the current direction?

Post reply on HN