Live data from Hacker News

Introducing Pixel C

pixel.google.com

21–30 of 88 posts

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#21

Why is this running Android instead of Chrome OS? Internal politics are clearly at work. Moreover, why isn't there a stylus. I really, really, appreciate 1:sqrt(2), but without an accurate, ultra low-latency stylus you can't treat it like a pad to express ideas on. The build looks fantastic, though. Arrrrgh, so much promise...

I've never understood the point of Chrome OS's existence as a separate thing from Android. So I'm glad it's an Android device.

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#22

Perhaps not such a great choice of name as years of web browsing have me instinctively associating the "pixel.*" domain with a tracking pixel - and that's what I initially thought this would be about.

Pixels have been shipping since February, 2013, so your comment is a few years too late. :)

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#23
post #16
post #6

The rumors expected this to run ChromeOS because its codename is apparently Ryu. If that's true, there are still changes being pushed to the ChromeOS codebase regarding this device: https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/platform/ec/+/1... which tells me there's still more to know about this device. I'm curious what it is. Even though I'm typing this on my first generation Pixel, is there really enough of a dif…

Devtools and Crouton would make this a pretty interesting device

Key problem is it's ARM and not Intel processor. How much of a real developer experience a crouton style solution enables on ARM, I'm not sure. But I'm guessing it's a lot more limited.

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#24

Perhaps not such a great choice of name as years of web browsing have me instinctively associating the "pixel.*" domain with a tracking pixel - and that's what I initially thought this would be about.

Pixels have been shipping since February, 2013, so your comment is a few years too late. :)

Chromebook Pixels, yes. Those have a page at https://www.google.com/chromebook/pixel/ which is definitely far less unambiguous.

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#25

Why is this running Android instead of Chrome OS? Internal politics are clearly at work. Moreover, why isn't there a stylus. I really, really, appreciate 1:sqrt(2), but without an accurate, ultra low-latency stylus you can't treat it like a pad to express ideas on. The build looks fantastic, though. Arrrrgh, so much promise...

ChromeOS may have the best security architecture in any networked consumer device ever sold.

Android, on the other hand, is not.

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#27

Why is this running Android instead of Chrome OS? Internal politics are clearly at work. Moreover, why isn't there a stylus. I really, really, appreciate 1:sqrt(2), but without an accurate, ultra low-latency stylus you can't treat it like a pad to express ideas on. The build looks fantastic, though. Arrrrgh, so much promise...

I think this marks a step in Google's jump into hardware.

An important one to denote that "Pixel" does not mean Chrome - it means Google.

The previous Pixel, even the first was the "Chromebook Pixel"

This is the "Pixel C"

One might fathom we could see a "Nexus Pixel" in the future.

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#29
post #23
post #16

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Devtools and Crouton would make this a pretty interesting device

Key problem is it's ARM and not Intel processor. How much of a real developer experience a crouton style solution enables on ARM, I'm not sure. But I'm guessing it's a lot more limited.

Limited in what respect? There's plenty of Linux distros which run on ARM/ARM64.

Re: Introducing Pixel C

#30
post #5

I was recently whining about the lack of a modern Sony VAIO P replacement. If this has a built-in 4G/LTE modem, I may want one, especially if it is possible to run Linux on it (maybe via Deploy Linux?). That's something else I recently whined about: why there is no 4G/LTE modem in any ultrabook (except for one or two unaffordable chromebooks not available in my country anyway)? It seems to be only in tablets and high…

I wondered this as well. My last laptop purchase was the Lenovo X1 Carbon 3443CTO, which I believe is the 2013 version. It's not easy to get to the WWAN card and replace it, and no idea if the BIOS would even let you.

Shortly after I got the laptop, Optus rolled out LTE in my city on a non-standard frequency (LTE-A on 2600mHz). This is one of the reasons I prefer a USB dongle or Wifi "hotspot".

Post reply on HN