The rings are not interleaved consistently, which is annoying me because there's no explanation as to why.
The middle ring is on top of all the rings, but the two bottom ones.
The right-most ring crosses its neighbours from under, instead of in an interleaved under/over like the other rings.
The top-left ring crosses its neighbours from over, in the same fashion.
The other 4 outer rings are (clockwise) over their precedent, then under their following ring.
I'm curious if it's on purpose. If it's not on purpose, then I'm a bit disappointed that something so obvious wasn't found, when the rest of the presentation and discourses suggest great consideration. If it is indeed on purpose, then I don't understand why it's not explained, and why they made the top-left, right most and center rings different from the other ones.
Anyways, in other cases I'd say I'm nitpicking a whole lot. But this is a flag design, their text appeals to great consideration for the craft of designing flags. I'm a noob and I can notice the inconsistency, so I'm perplexed.