New Approach to Automated Company Classification
blog.getcontext.io
New Approach to Automated Company Classification
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: New Approach to Automated Company Classification
#2Hey everyone! We have set up a demo, feel free to give it a try, all feedback is welcome! Thanks
Re: New Approach to Automated Company Classification
#3Hm.Google
It seems to work somewhat for SV startup companies, but fails pretty badly on others.
Eg:
IBM
https://www.getcontext.io/classifier/#/about/ibm: Evenly distributed between Augmented Reality/Cloud Computing/Cloud Infrastructure/Entertainment/Fintech/HR
https://www.getcontext.io/classifier/#/about/google - apparently about virtual currency and crypto currency as much as a search engine.
Ford: No result
GE: Serves results for GEICO
Re: New Approach to Automated Company Classification
#4Hm. It seems to work somewhat for SV startup companies, but fails pretty badly on others. Eg: IBM https://www.getcontext.io/classifier/#/about/ibm : Evenly distributed between Augmented Reality/Cloud Computing/Cloud Infrastructure/Entertainment/Fintech/HR Google https://www.getcontext.io/classifier/#/about/google - apparently about virtual currency and crypto currency as much as a search engine. Ford: No result GE: S…
Hi NL, thx for giving our hack a spin. We are working on it. Next version will have auto generated feature trees which will result in much better results.
Re: New Approach to Automated Company Classification
#5Nice tool.
But as nl stated, not that accurate for some companies.
Would be great if you could describe in more detail how you create the classification.
Re: New Approach to Automated Company Classification
#6Nice tool. But as nl stated, not that accurate for some companies. Would be great if you could describe in more detail how you create the classification.
thx, recognized the variance, two things: results are based on a tech domain specific vector (based on 1.2m tech articles / 20y), so non-techs fall off. We source content on requested entities live. Descriptions of younger entities are more concise/less global -> more valid classification. But then again, our assumption was that there is more demand for classification of little known entities than for F100s. But we are here to validate/falsify that assumption.
Re: New Approach to Automated Company Classification
#7Nice tool. But as nl stated, not that accurate for some companies. Would be great if you could describe in more detail how you create the classification.
thx, recognized the variance, two things: results are based on a tech domain specific vector (based on 1.2m tech articles / 20y), so non-techs fall off. We source content on requested entities live. Descriptions of younger entities are more concise/less global -> more valid classification. But then again, our assumption was that there is more demand for classification of little known entities than for F100s. But we a…
*vector space