Live data from Hacker News

Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

fastcoexist.com

101–110 of 345 posts

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#101
post #64

To my mind, one of the main issues, in addition to protected bike lanes is the spread. Bike friendly cities are more compact. Commuting to work via bike is not a strenuous fifteen mile commute one way. They tend to be leisurely few mile rides. Now, not to say it's not possible, but a one to five mile bike ride is not the same as a ten to fifteen or more miles bike ride. Now, I do like Copenhagen's above ground bike r…

Sure, you're never going to get people who live 15 or 20 miles out biking the whole way to work, but there's lots of people who live You also have to keep in mind biking as a first-mile/last-mile complement to rail transit. If there's good bike paths to get to a transit station, that effectively extends the usable radius of the station. Already, lots of people bike to Caltrain and then bike from their stop to work (I…

The local solution is to own two old run-down bikes and lock them at either station. You still run a risk of theft or damage, but the investment is not that big.

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#102

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Remington has full size bike lanes, Mary and Bernardo are in the works to get them, and I don't know where the proposal for Homestead is these days.

Two things: Remington & Homestead don't connect to Stevens Creek Trail, and Mary & Bernardo aren't East-West streets. You said they were adding protected bike lanes, are any of those protected? Off the top of my head, I can't think of any protected bike lanes I've seen in Sunnyvale.

Fair enough, I would ride Remington to Bernardo, up to Heatherstone and then along Heatherstone to the trail entrance.

We may have a different definition of protected, I think of the lanes on Remington as protected but they are created by striping, not curb work, so it isn't like there is a lane all to itself.

If you want to get involved, you can talk to the council at the BPAC meetings : http://sunnyvale.ca.gov/CityGovernment/BoardsandCommissions/... And see the current map: http://sunnyvale.ca.gov/Portals/0/Sunnyvale/DPW/Transportati... (from 2007, they are updating it)

In general, the city is very supportive of creating a bike friendly environment.

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#103
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How about public transport you can take the bikes with you on, and nice bike paths in the denser areas?

The denser areas, especially the bay side belt are quite are quite bike friendly. Public transportation is a completely different question, bikes on buses do not work, some train services can be adopted with special carriages to carry bikes on board. The main issue isn't just roads its and entire infrastructure, e.g. giving bikes priority over motor vehicles like in some European countries which might not work well,…

London has a long-standing culture issue because, for decades, the only way to get across the city safely by bike has been to ride aggressively.

You say "you can't just go from 0 to 60". That applies to bike culture too. As the segregated lanes are put in, London's cycling culture will become calmer, just as it is in Copenhagen or the best Netherlands cities.

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#105
post #95

Based on the photo at the bottom they are going to fail the same way that many other US cities have failed when trying install bike lanes. You MUST put the parked cars between moving traffic and bikes. If you do not bikers are going to get hit and doored and will obstruct turn lanes. Pretty much everywhere in Europe gets this right. Traffic -> parking -> bikes -> peds. How did the US get everything completely backwar…

I wouldn't say pretty much everywhere. Probably only in Amsterdam. In Berlin it's mostly: cars | bikes | parking | pedestrians (raised sidewalk). In Warsaw (for example) it's: cars | parking | bikes (part of the sidewalk) | pedestrians (raised sidewalk).

Warsaw is a pretty terrible example to follow. The bike lanes zigzag from road to sidewalk and back with no reason, and do things like deliver you into a huge roundabout where the bike lane ends without warning.

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#106
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, you're never going to get people who live 15 or 20 miles out biking the whole way to work, but there's lots of people who live You also have to keep in mind biking as a first-mile/last-mile complement to rail transit. If there's good bike paths to get to a transit station, that effectively extends the usable radius of the station. Already, lots of people bike to Caltrain and then bike from their stop to work (I…

> Sure, you're never going to get people who live 15 or 20 miles out biking the whole way to work That's what I do every day in London. Why wouldn't you? Myself and a lot of my friends choose our housing approx' 45 minutes to an hour away from the centre of London just to ensure we've got a good ride every day. At a commuter average of 16mph, and an experienced cyclist average of 18/19mph means that 15 to 20 miles is…

You do realize that most people are not like you, though?

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#107
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"It seems people in the US fetishize road bikes with drop bars and skinny tires as the 'best and fastest' kind of bike" I don't think that true. The general opinion I've seen where I live is that bikes are toys and paying above a few hundred for one is ridiculous. I do agree that you probably don't want a race oriented road bike if your goal is to commute to work a few miles but if you enjoy the sport and know what y…

Outside the Bay Area in the US, I see a lot of hybrid and mountain bikes. In Silicon Valley, there's definitely a preference for multi-thousand $ road bikes -- and people ride them, hard. Still, riding your carbon race bike to the office is akin to driving your Ferrari to the grocery store -- uncomfortable on rough roads, no storage space, and when you get there, where do you park?

Parking can be an issue but I would hope that most large tech companies now offer interior protected bike storage. Seems like a cheap perk that keep employee healthy.

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#108
post #82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sure, you're never going to get people who live 15 or 20 miles out biking the whole way to work, but there's lots of people who live You also have to keep in mind biking as a first-mile/last-mile complement to rail transit. If there's good bike paths to get to a transit station, that effectively extends the usable radius of the station. Already, lots of people bike to Caltrain and then bike from their stop to work (I…

> Sure, you're never going to get people who live 15 or 20 miles out biking the whole way to work That's what I do every day in London. Why wouldn't you? Myself and a lot of my friends choose our housing approx' 45 minutes to an hour away from the centre of London just to ensure we've got a good ride every day. At a commuter average of 16mph, and an experienced cyclist average of 18/19mph means that 15 to 20 miles is…

Many, many people:

- do not have showers at work

- do not have safe routes to ride

- are not experienced cyclists

- average more like 10mph

The discussion is not "how do we get hardcore bike nuts to ride to work". That's not hard.

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#109
post #95

Based on the photo at the bottom they are going to fail the same way that many other US cities have failed when trying install bike lanes. You MUST put the parked cars between moving traffic and bikes. If you do not bikers are going to get hit and doored and will obstruct turn lanes. Pretty much everywhere in Europe gets this right. Traffic -> parking -> bikes -> peds. How did the US get everything completely backwar…

I wouldn't say pretty much everywhere. Probably only in Amsterdam. In Berlin it's mostly: cars | bikes | parking | pedestrians (raised sidewalk). In Warsaw (for example) it's: cars | parking | bikes (part of the sidewalk) | pedestrians (raised sidewalk).

Places I've been in the UK get this right, as well as Erlangen and Koln, and from google maps it seems like Munich gets it right as well. A rather small sample, but I suspect that the traffic engineering generalizes.

Re: Google Wants to Make Silicon Valley as Bike-Friendly as Copenhagen

#110
post #92
post #86

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I think it's tragic that ebikes have become the domain of drunks and losers. We have the perfect solution to global warming and urban intensification right there, and no self-respecting person will use it because it's a tool of the underclass.

I've never heard of this stigma in the US. Where is this coming from? edit: I see in your other comments you mention Ontario, interesting. Seems so strange that a mode of transportation could carry such a stigma.

Several of my friends are bike shop workers in Chicago, I can confirm this is quickly becoming the preferred "DUI Bike" for those with the means.
Post reply on HN