Live data from Hacker News

A New Face for Pebble

blog.getpebble.com

41–50 of 178 posts

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Apple or Google announcing new flagship phones every year vs Pebble announcing a new watch in a matter of months ? Can't exactly draw parallels here. Something similar would be Apple announces iPhone 6S now and iPhone 6S+ in 3 months.

Keep in mind though that this is same watch internals in a differently shaped case. It doesn't take a year to do that.

True that.

But the thousands of Kickstarter backers might have loved an option

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#42

It's worth noting that this device, unlike any of the previous Pebble devices, is not waterproof. I was smitten until I noticed this - not having to worry about getting it soaked while cycling or swimming is a rather nice feature of my Pebble Time and it looks like I'll be sticking with it for that (even if I do love the new design).

Quoting from [1]: Pebble Time Round is splash resistant but not waterproof. Incidental exposure to water–like unforeseeable rain–won’t ruin your device, but submerging the watch is not recommended. Pebble’s leather bands are not water resistant. [1] https://pebble.com/buy-pebble-time-round-smartwatch

Do people who wear those watches just wet their finger tips when washing their hands?

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#43
post #17

Same price as the Moto 360 with half the features and twice the bezel on top.

But a lot thinner and presumably a far better battery life.

I'm not going to get the Pebble Round, but I'd be far more willing to strap one to my wrist than I would the Moto 360 monstrosity.

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#44
post #40
post #29

Hmm, so this is an oddly-timed launch. I was just wondering if I should replace my ks-edition pebble with a pebble time, and now here I'm wondering about the pebble round time or whatever. The new round watch probably looks nice, although I'm worried about the bezel size and it not being waterproof. It does look a lot thinner and more watch-like than most other smartwatches, even before you get to the 7-day battery.…

The new Time Round has a two day battery life, FYI. Even more reason to not buy it.

Woah, two days? I missed that in the description. Yep, not going to get one of those at all.

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#45
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

EDIT: My post is wrong, see replies. IMHO it has one killer feature the Moto 360 doesn't - e-ink (which brings with it always-on display, bright-light readability and power savings benefits). For that reason alone I'd be way more likely to pick up one of these than a 360. I also like the design a lot more (huge bezel and all), but that's even more subjective.

It doesn't use e-ink. It uses a Sharp Memory LCD ( http://www.sharpmemorylcd.com ). I think Pebble calls it e-paper because they promised e-ink in their first kickstarter but were unable to deliver on that. No one else calls it that. I assume a custom e-ink display was too expensive. The first Pebble used the same display as one of the early Nike watches, which made it a lot cheaper.

Well, TIL. My bad! And I just checked the battery life - only two days? Ugh. Guess I'll be holding off on smartwatches for a while yet still.

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#46
post #33
post #17

Same price as the Moto 360 with half the features and twice the bezel on top.

EDIT: My post is wrong, see replies. IMHO it has one killer feature the Moto 360 doesn't - e-ink (which brings with it always-on display, bright-light readability and power savings benefits). For that reason alone I'd be way more likely to pick up one of these than a 360. I also like the design a lot more (huge bezel and all), but that's even more subjective.

The "2 days" battery life makes me reconsider. The Moto 360v2 can get nearly the same (not in ambient mode), but it has a better screen that you can even see in the dark... The only reason I would want to get a pebble vs the moto is that it has a longer battery life (a week or so?), but this thing gets only slightly better battery life, yet costs nearly the same, eh, to me it's just not worth it.

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#47
post #36

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> you just shipped thousands of people something And now you announce something which makes that look old. So... just like Apple does every year, not to mention pretty much every other hardware company in existence? The alternative is not to make anything new, which would just be dumb. > Am i to understand that I wont be getting updates on my Pebble Time in the near future Well, seeing as Pebble Time is still a brand…

> So... just like Apple does every year Difference being that Apple doesn't offer an extended return period for devices just because they released a new one. And why should they? It shows investors a lack of confidence in their products. You sold us on the Time Steel just 6 months ago, and now it already might not be good enough to keep? Why not?

So wait, you're faulting Pebble for having a generous return policy, and praising Apple for not giving you any options? ...I don't get it.

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#48

This is very weird tbh I mean you just shipped thousands of people something And now you announce something which makes that look old. It's scary to own something from a company like this. Am i to understand that I wont be getting updates on my Pebble Time in the near future because there is a new kid on the block ?

You realise you are posting on Hacker News not the Daily Mail yes?

This is a heavily technology focused community and in the wonderful world of technology things change. Quickly. Complaining about a new product coming out is quite baffling to me. Perhaps your post would make sense if they had announced they were only going to develop and support this product going forward but they didn't so I find your post quite out of place around here.

I don't mean to be rude (although it will no doubt come across like I am).

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#49
post #33

Earlier quoted context omitted.

EDIT: My post is wrong, see replies. IMHO it has one killer feature the Moto 360 doesn't - e-ink (which brings with it always-on display, bright-light readability and power savings benefits). For that reason alone I'd be way more likely to pick up one of these than a 360. I also like the design a lot more (huge bezel and all), but that's even more subjective.

It doesn't use e-ink. It uses a Sharp Memory LCD ( http://www.sharpmemorylcd.com ). I think Pebble calls it e-paper because they promised e-ink in their first kickstarter but were unable to deliver on that. No one else calls it that. I assume a custom e-ink display was too expensive. The first Pebble used the same display as one of the early Nike watches, which made it a lot cheaper.

The original Pebble uses a Sharp LCD. The Pebble Time uses JDI display. I have no idea what display the Time Round uses: do you know for sure it's a Sharp unit?

Re: A New Face for Pebble

#50
It's pretty, but they're continuing to compromise core features (waterproofness, battery) which make Pebbles unique, while their software and abilities and displays lag far behind the pack (partly due to vendor lock-in).

I loved my OG Steel. But they won't compete against the Apple Watches and Moto 360s of the world by mirroring their shortcomings and price while providing none of the deep integration, apps, and features.

I think ultimately, the Pebble line will need to become the leader of the "Smart-ish" watches. They'll display notifications, and allow some very limited interactions, but will always be more watch than smart. This will work great for non-geeky people who would love to get notifications quickly and silently, while still retaining the advantages of a more conventional watch (don't worry about charging, water, durability or daylight).

Then, the wrist computers (e.g Apple Watch or Android Wear) will exist for somebody who wants the geekier, app-ier experience and will take some compromises for it.

Post reply on HN