Live data from Hacker News

$1 Unistroke Recognizer

depts.washington.edu

31–40 of 43 posts

Re: $1 Unistroke Recognizer

#33

If you draw brackets from bottom up they are recorded inverted. For example, } drawn from bottom up is "recognized" as {.

That's because it's rotationally insensitive, which is a rather interesting property. I'm not sure how useful it is, but it certainly surprised me.

Re: $1 Unistroke Recognizer

#34

There's also a 1¢ recognizer, which supposedly improves this one in every way, yet has gone about fairly unnoticed, comparatively. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2331074

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_determinism

you need to expand on your point, because I don't get at all.

Re: $1 Unistroke Recognizer

#35
post #5

I wrapped their latest recognizer the $P Point-Cloud Recognizer, as a node.js module here: https://github.com/francoislaberge/outlines Their implementation is quite clean, it really is a nice clean algorithm. It takes reading it to understand the type of shapes (templates) that work best and also as a user how best to draw them. I added a demo that shows you as you draw what it's internal state is and best guess so f…

I really love the feedback in the demo as to what the recognizer is guessing. If my Palm had that I believe I might have been even faster at writing graffiti. It allows you to quickly correct a "letterform" to get the desired glyph.

Re: $1 Unistroke Recognizer

#37

Article did not answer my first question, which is why this thing is called "$1". I clicked expecting to discover some sort of cheap hardware device.

> To enable novice programmers to incorporate gestures into their UI prototypes, we present a “$1 recognizer” that is easy, cheap, and usable almost anywhere in about 100 lines of code

Re: $1 Unistroke Recognizer

#39
The software assigns any sufficiently long user input to one of the 16 gestures.

In contrast, human-to-human communication consider much (most?) of the space of possible speech acts to be gibberish.

In other words, the software never gives up on trying to classify a user-input sequence no matter how wacky it is.

Re: $1 Unistroke Recognizer

#40

Earlier quoted context omitted.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nominative_determinism

you need to expand on your point, because I don't get at all.

"There's also a 1¢ recognizer, which supposedly improves on the $1 recognizer in every way, yet for some reason isn't valued as highly...."
Post reply on HN