Earlier quoted context omitted.
You're misunderstanding, mischaracterizing, and conflating your own arguments. It's a rhetorical appeal to authority, so implicitly, in addition to anyone who shares my respect for and identifies with the values of the American legal heritage, I agree with it. Therefore, even though it has no direct application, as you unnecessarily point out, it is a rhetorical convenience for delineating our very different views of…
Oh yes, the good old "my argument is based entirely on facts, while yours is based entirely on nonsense, so they are not comparable." Except I don't see a single fact in your original comment. Sorry, but we're both in the same boat here. We're both making political comments while bringing in our own biases based on a lot of assumptions about how things went down. The difference is, I admit it.
"my argument is based [...] on facts, [...] yours ... on nonsense, [they're] not comparable."
I said your stance was based on presumptions, mine on facts, which are by definition incomparable since one is the basis for a conclusion, the other is a search of evidence to fit a pre-concieved conclusion and is typically based on prior context or experience. Except I don't see a single fact in your original comment.
Then you missed it. The TechCrunch author's controversializing use of race is not supported by any specific facts and is merely a presumption based on circumstantial evidence.Now, we're in agreement that you believe presumptions are sufficient to reach different conclusions, and I do not.
while bringing in our own biases based on a lot of assumptions
You're confused and not following along. Not only do I make no assumptions on this issue; that assumptions should never be made is my whole point. The difference is, I admit it.
Your position is that we both make assumptions. My position is that assumptions should not be made and that your stance is justly objectionable. Do you see that admitting the above would not only be a self-contradiction, but, in fact, it would be a reversal?