Sneakers was better.
'Hackers' at 20
41–50 of 164 posts
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#42Earlier quoted context omitted.
I know. I was just referring to how Swordfish was so much worse than Hackers, even with the latter's inaccuracies. It's time for a Jeri Ellsworth biopic anyway. With Flying biology books and car racing!!!
I think that would be premature. She's still kicking ass. At least wait until she's past middle age.
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#43I was never that upset about Hackers, but I've had my fair share of laughs at it over the years. I've had some revelations since then though. If you don't document things yourself, you don't get to write history. There just isn't that much material out there of how things were. In hind-sight I also think it was more accurate than given credit for. Partly because a lot of the things it described, like phreaking, isn't…
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#44It's been a very long time since I've seen the movie, but I was going to make the same point that the director does: it was never intended to be realistic, just a fantasy which captured the right feelings. It's probably not a good movie for other reasons, but I think it was successful at doing that. I've heard similar criticism of William Gibson's work, that his 1980s-flavored cyberpunk makes no sense scientifically…
>Set in the near future, huge megacorporations control and dominate entire economies. Their wealth and competitive advantage reside in the human capital of their employees and the intellectual property they produce. Corporations jealously guard their most valuable employees and go to great expense to keep them safe and happily productive. There is little point in traditional corporate espionage as new products are developed at a lightning pace; there is no time to capitalize on the intelligence acquired from a rival firm, it will be obsolete before it can be used. Companies now hire extraction agents to steal each other's top productive employees.
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#45[1] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0105435/
[2] http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0159784/
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#46Sneakers was better.
Sneakers has held up amazingly well to the passage of time. It didn't do anything impossible, just highly improbable. If you haven't rewatched it in a while, it's worth watching again.
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#47I was never that upset about Hackers, but I've had my fair share of laughs at it over the years. I've had some revelations since then though. If you don't document things yourself, you don't get to write history. There just isn't that much material out there of how things were. In hind-sight I also think it was more accurate than given credit for. Partly because a lot of the things it described, like phreaking, isn't…
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#48Awesome quote. Computers/programming/"hacking" were definitely a mind-expanding experience for me as a teen. While "grown ups" saw a boring beige box, the machine felt alive with limitless possibilities to me.
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#49Sneakers was better.
I haven't revisited it since Snowden happened, but I really ought to.
Re: 'Hackers' at 20
#50I can also certainly can relate to the portion of the audience that found phreaking much more interesting than hacking and the fact that the phreaking scene is all but dead is pretty sad.