Big Boss
Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
11–19 of 19 posts
Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#12Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure why you're being downvoted because what you say is true. If medical devices provide a two way path of communication between the brain, then it is certainly true that there is a risk of manipulating the human brain directly with not-so-friendly intentions.
Downvoting should be used to indicate relevancy. The comment is obviously relevant. They downvote because most are still little boys and girls just exerting their right to downvote, not intending to use it for it's real use.
Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#13Rarely have I felt so conflicted. The path towards relieving human suffering also leads inexorably to erasing human autonomy. Every increase in human control of neural-interface medical devices risks a corollary magnification of medical-device control of human neurons. Yet the relevant companies make no attempt to screen for this risk, guaranteeing that, if present trends continue, it is only a matter of time until a…
I'm not sure why you're being downvoted because what you say is true. If medical devices provide a two way path of communication between the brain, then it is certainly true that there is a risk of manipulating the human brain directly with not-so-friendly intentions.
[0] http://www.wired.com/2015/07/hackers-remotely-kill-jeep-high...
Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#14Rarely have I felt so conflicted. The path towards relieving human suffering also leads inexorably to erasing human autonomy. Every increase in human control of neural-interface medical devices risks a corollary magnification of medical-device control of human neurons. Yet the relevant companies make no attempt to screen for this risk, guaranteeing that, if present trends continue, it is only a matter of time until a…
Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#15Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#16Can I use this to have 6 arms?
Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#17Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not sure why you're being downvoted because what you say is true. If medical devices provide a two way path of communication between the brain, then it is certainly true that there is a risk of manipulating the human brain directly with not-so-friendly intentions.
Downvoting should be used to indicate relevancy. The comment is obviously relevant. They downvote because most are still little boys and girls just exerting their right to downvote, not intending to use it for it's real use.
Personally I've downvoted you for the tone of your comment not for the fact that you expressed disagreement with people downvoting the parent comment.
Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#18Earlier quoted context omitted.
Downvoting should be used to indicate relevancy. The comment is obviously relevant. They downvote because most are still little boys and girls just exerting their right to downvote, not intending to use it for it's real use.
FYI the founder of this website has said that downvoting a comment to show disagreement is perfectly fine by him, not just for irrelevant/spammy comments. Personally I've downvoted you for the tone of your comment not for the fact that you expressed disagreement with people downvoting the parent comment.
Re: Darpa creates prosthetic arm that “feels”
#19Rarely have I felt so conflicted. The path towards relieving human suffering also leads inexorably to erasing human autonomy. Every increase in human control of neural-interface medical devices risks a corollary magnification of medical-device control of human neurons. Yet the relevant companies make no attempt to screen for this risk, guaranteeing that, if present trends continue, it is only a matter of time until a…
Not really - it can work the other way where people who are handicapped and need carers will be able to regain independence.