Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
81–89 of 89 posts
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#82This is a symbol that will be used 10s of millions of times in the next few years. If not much much more. The fact it's even in discussion if it should be there is a huge free flow of speech rights issue. I'd like to think if you're on hn you see the problems around the fact this was not there years ago. I want a world were people can communicate exactly as they wish. Not by a standard, especially a standard with mor…
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
No need. The Unicode Consortium is not a therapeutic institution. It's about humans and their language, not about happiness. The Unicode Consortium is a non-profit corporation devoted to developing, maintaining, and promoting software internationalization standards and data, particularly the Unicode Standard, which specifies the representation of text in all modern software products and standards. The Unicode Consort…
> It's about humans and their language Particularly relevant because e.g.: * is offensive in Brazil. * is offensive in the middle-east. Unicode assigns numbers to the symbols. Humans assign meanings to the symbols.
Well, not really. It may be, or may not. People use it as an Ok symbol too, what makes it quite useless for either use.
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Communicating that a conversation is now at an end is often a useful feature, rather than a bug.
But using this symbol is ending the conversation in a disrespectful way, thereby nullifying the rest of the communication.
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#85It's offensive, a sad commentary on humanity, and I don't mind being down voted on Hacker News for stating it openly. (Actually, if you really want to do things right, just flip me off, yes?)
By what measure? To whom?
> a sad commentary on humanity
Again: by what measure?
Offensiveness is arbitrary.
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
Communicating that a conversation is now at an end is often a useful feature, rather than a bug.
But using this symbol is ending the conversation in a disrespectful way, thereby nullifying the rest of the communication.
edit - though maybe a Shakespearian play. I wonder if they have an emoji for biting your thumb at someone.
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#87This serves as a reminder that the Unicode standard is remarkable US centric at times. Where's the guy flipping the bottom of his chin? Where's whatever the equivalent in Bangladesh is? (I'm sure there is one...)
Emoji is actually more Japan centric, hence the numerous sushi emoji, bento box emoji and various other Japanese items.
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#88It's offensive, a sad commentary on humanity, and I don't mind being down voted on Hacker News for stating it openly. (Actually, if you really want to do things right, just flip me off, yes?)
Re: Finally, it will be possible to flip someone off via emoji
#89And the V sign is there but the reverse two fingered salute is not. Though perhaps that would lead to too much confusion and accidental offense between cultures. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_sign#As_an_insult
Au contraire: U+1F594 Unfortunately they name it 'REVERSED VICTORY HAND', which might get people in trouble.