Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
google.github.io
Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
1–10 of 60 posts
Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#2Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#3I'm clearly missing something, but I can't be bothered to watch the videos - can someone TL;DR it for me, please.
Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#4Then why did they killed websql in chrome packaged apps?
Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#5What is a browser database and what is it good for? Would you use one instead of a back-end DB or in conjunction with one? How? Why? Why is this on 1st page - what is cool about it? I'm clearly missing something, but I can't be bothered to watch the videos - can someone TL;DR it for me, please.
For me I'd like to:
Firebase as backend. Sync user data to browser. Query user data elegantly in browser using select statements.
Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#6What is a browser database and what is it good for? Would you use one instead of a back-end DB or in conjunction with one? How? Why? Why is this on 1st page - what is cool about it? I'm clearly missing something, but I can't be bothered to watch the videos - can someone TL;DR it for me, please.
Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#7Then why did they killed websql in chrome packaged apps?
probably because websql was not accepted as a w3c standard. Browser vendors should not add tech that works only on their browser and are not on the path to standardization.
The problem was that browser APIs require independent implementations to become standard. Chrome used SQLite for their WebSQL, which left Firefox without a good option. (Implementing a SQLite clone isn't feasible with their budget.) So, the standard was dropped.
It's a shame, because SQLite is a great tech.
Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#8Earlier quoted context omitted.
probably because websql was not accepted as a w3c standard. Browser vendors should not add tech that works only on their browser and are not on the path to standardization.
Yeah, that was a bummer situation. The problem was that browser APIs require independent implementations to become standard. Chrome used SQLite for their WebSQL, which left Firefox without a good option. (Implementing a SQLite clone isn't feasible with their budget.) So, the standard was dropped. It's a shame, because SQLite is a great tech.
Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#9Re: Lovefield – A relational database for web apps
#10What is a browser database and what is it good for? Would you use one instead of a back-end DB or in conjunction with one? How? Why? Why is this on 1st page - what is cool about it? I'm clearly missing something, but I can't be bothered to watch the videos - can someone TL;DR it for me, please.
It's like having PouchDB -> CouchDB but with SQL not NoSQL For me I'd like to: Firebase as backend. Sync user data to browser. Query user data elegantly in browser using select statements.
Also, without the replication and conflict detection.