Live data from Hacker News

TSA Master Keys

schneier.com

131–140 of 149 posts

Re: TSA Master Keys

#131

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pretty sure that in terms of person-miles per gallon flying is comparable to automobiles. Are you referring to some secondary damage that flying causes?

http://environment.about.com/od/greenlivingdesign/a/fly_vs_d...

Well next time I'll be sure to drive from Paris to New York. Thanks for the tip.

Re: TSA Master Keys

#132

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I am pretty sure that in terms of person-miles per gallon flying is comparable to automobiles. Are you referring to some secondary damage that flying causes?

Actually, flying is better than almost all cars sold in the US (except for the VW Up!, which comes close). An Airbus A380 uses the equivalent energy of 3l gasoline per passenger per 100km. This is a mileage of 80mpg. Only rail is more efficient.

I remember reading somewhere that rail, and most other mass transit, isn't actually that efficient. The idea being that sure, a bus or train full of people is really efficient, but in order to get all of those people to want to ride it, you have to run a lot of empty or almost-empty vehicles around all the time. Sum up all the trips for the whole system, and it's about the same as an average-ish car.

Re: TSA Master Keys

#133
post #6

Not only is this another impressive demonstration of incompetence, but by disseminating the idea that people's luggage could be “secure” and “backdoored” at the same time, they're actually destroying what security has existed before. They should pivot to be the “Transport Endangerment Agency”.

Solution: take a gun. Seriously. In stark contrast with the requirement that TSA be able to open your luggage (unlocked or backdoored), if you declare a firearm in your checked luggage the TSA cannot - by law - have the means to open your [hard-shell] luggage, YOU must retain the key or combination and must be present to open it when inspected. (Of course, traveling legally with a gun has its own litany of issues, bu…

Make sure not to fly to New York. They will enforce state firearms laws when you return to the airport and attempt to check your gun.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/10/nyregion/lawful-handguns-d...

Re: TSA Master Keys

#134
I generally use either a pelican case with abloy protec 2 321 or 330 padlocks (essentially the least pickable), or a pacsafe anti theft suitcase with tsa lock and seals. Not perfect, but beyond casual or even local LEO surreptitious entry.

Re: TSA Master Keys

#135
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Could you declare a gun and not carry one? And then claim you forgot it if anyone checks?

No. They will make you open the case and show the gun is safe/unloaded. They then affix a tag to the gun, which declares that there is, in fact, a gun in this case (with the tag inside the case, a rather surreal requirement).

Inconsistent. No airport I use regularly does chamber checks anymore, and I routinely fly with handguns and sometimes rifles.

At LAS they don't even do a TSA screen. They put a tag in he bag at gate and just use X-ray on the bags later. They will call you at the terminal over PA if there is an issue.

Re: TSA Master Keys

#136
post #92

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Solution: take a gun. Seriously. In stark contrast with the requirement that TSA be able to open your luggage (unlocked or backdoored), if you declare a firearm in your checked luggage the TSA cannot - by law - have the means to open your [hard-shell] luggage, YOU must retain the key or combination and must be present to open it when inspected. (Of course, traveling legally with a gun has its own litany of issues, bu…

Many photographers travel with a flare gun or starter pistol in their equipment case specifically for this reason. The $10/hour grunt workers can't get access to your super-expensive equipment if you're transporting a gun and have the case properly secured.

It doesn't make your equipment any safer, guns are stolen from US airports all the time:

Although the law requires guns to be carried in locked, hard-sided cases, baggage handlers have no problem getting into such luggage, he said. The other possibility, experts said, is that TSA screeners who X-ray or inspect bags by hand could be pocketing the guns. Source: http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2006-08-14/news/060814020...

Re: TSA Master Keys

#138
post #64

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What about corporate travelers taking prototypes and other sensitive items in pelican cases or similar luggage?

Pelican cases offer durability, not security.

They are way better than anything with a zipper. The best SE on a pelican is to attack the hinge.

Re: TSA Master Keys

#139
post #72
post #11

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Most luggage isn't really secure in the first place. It takes less time to open up a suitcase with a good knife than it does to unzip many suitcases. The idea that a little padlock will protect your suitcase from thieves is laughable. Like physical mail, the system is based on trust, and trying to patch security onto it is difficult.

Padlocks protect you from baggage handlers getting a little on the side while on the job. If a baggage handler slices your bag open with a knife, that's going to be noticed quickly, and the odds of being caught are high. If the bag is unlocked and he can merely unzip it, pocket something valuable, and replace it, then that may not be discovered for many hours or even days, and the odds of being caught are much lower.…

Padlocks don't prevent this at all. Take a zippered bag (any zippered bag). Jab a ballpoint pen between the zippers, then easily pull them apart with your hands. To re-zip, take the locked-together pair of zips and slide them back and forth from one side of the bag to the other.

This requires no more effort or skill than opening an un-"locked" bag.

Re: TSA Master Keys

#140

Earlier quoted context omitted.

http://environment.about.com/od/greenlivingdesign/a/fly_vs_d...

Well next time I'll be sure to drive from Paris to New York. Thanks for the tip.

Nothing would be more efficient than a boat, but that would take a serious level of commitment to the environment.
Post reply on HN