Live data from Hacker News

The xkcd survey

docs.google.com

271–280 of 281 posts

Re: The xkcd survey

#271

Earlier quoted context omitted.

How come?

It's always the number everyone thinks no one else will choose.

Isn't 37 the most random number?

I saw a list once of what makes each number from 1 to 100 special. One of them was the most random number (I think 37). Another one was the least special (63 perhaps?).

Re: The xkcd survey

#272
post #93

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I wonder how many entered 'any 5 random words'

I went for "arbitrary, stochastic, erratic, haphazard, aleatory".

I went for the first 5 words that came to mind, which randomly happened to all be drinks from the previous question.

Re: The xkcd survey

#273

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some of them were definitely highly specific jargon to medical fields and the like. I'm betting fewer of them are made up than you think.

Mmmm... no. * Phoropter * Tribution * Slickle * Cadine * Fination * Apricity * Revergent * Unitory * Trephony These are not words. They are not highly specific jargon either. They are just made up nonsense.

I would argue as a descriptivist that revergent is a legit English word - something that was previously divergent that is now tending towards convergence.

Re: The xkcd survey

#274
post #268

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sigh. I hit "Enter" and it submitted the form without letting me finish. Now they will never know if I'm a dog or a cat person...

I suspect the real problem isn't so much hitting "enter" but hitting it directly after the other hand hit "tab". A text field should be able to deal with an enter.

The text fields do handle the enter key correctly. Sometimes you just accidentally press enter and the form lacks required fields and validation.

Re: The xkcd survey

#275
post #246

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Sigh. I hit "Enter" and it submitted the form without letting me finish. Now they will never know if I'm a dog or a cat person...

hit back button, continued.

I hit back and my answers weren't there. I did end up doing the second half of the survey but I was hoping my dataset would be complete.

Re: The xkcd survey

#276

Earlier quoted context omitted.

As far as I know, it's not possible to record respondents' IP addresses with Google Surveys, so I think that one's out. I suppose you could make rough inferences based on the food, weather, and snow questions.

The keyboard part will help quite a bit, at least. Being from Norway, the occasional æ-ø-ås are quite revealing.

I type on Dvorak, so lots of "oeuieu" (clusters of vowels) in there. Midway through the gibberish I typed "this is a dvorak keyboard" just for grins.

Re: The xkcd survey

#277

I wonder how many responses of : Cantaloupe');DROP TABLE Food;-- ol' Randal is going to get (or some permutation thereof). Figuring that Randal is pretty smart, I bet he has a piece of code to parse out that. Still, anyone here have a good hack that can just nuke days of his time whilst completing this form? Only other one I can think of him using is (for Matlab): Cantaloupe'); clear all; clc; close all;

I assume he'd use python for the parsing with the CSV library, so just including lots of quotes, commas, \t, and \n characters would probably mess something up.

Re: The xkcd survey

#278

I wonder how much the dynamic URLs to the forms are playing a part in this. Each refresh of the comic [1] and homepage [2] gets a different form URL. Are these being associated with other data from the xkcd.com domain..? And how much has it messed up Randall to have such shenanigans defeated by a direct form URL being submitted to Hacker News. In fact, how do we know that the form URL submitted to Hacker News is one…

Google forms has an option to randomize the order of the answers and the questions.

Re: The xkcd survey

#279

So is the last question not a common thing? Because I do it every year or so, but my wife thinks I am crazy.

For those of you who are tired of matching socks after laundry but don't want to wear the same black socks all the time, I solved this issue by buying very colourful socks. Each pair is very different to the other pairs, so when it's time to pair them up, it's instantly obvious which socks belong to a pair.

Re: The xkcd survey

#280

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Some of them were definitely highly specific jargon to medical fields and the like. I'm betting fewer of them are made up than you think.

Mmmm... no. * Phoropter * Tribution * Slickle * Cadine * Fination * Apricity * Revergent * Unitory * Trephony These are not words. They are not highly specific jargon either. They are just made up nonsense.

"Slickle" has an entry as slang in the urban dictionary.

"Revergent" gets a definition here[1] as "a mutation that precisely restores a mutant DNA sequence to a WT DNA sequence".

[0] http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Slickle [1] http://www.flashcardmachine.com/questions-set-2.html

Post reply on HN