Live data from Hacker News

The xkcd survey

docs.google.com

201–210 of 281 posts

Re: The xkcd survey

#201
post #195
post #6

If you like this sort of thing, you may also enjoy: 1) My website Correlated.org ( http://www.correlated.org ), which has been generating weird correlations based on users' survey responses for more than four years. 2) Spurious Correlations ( http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations ) by Tyler Vigen, which also offers wacky correlations, but based on publicly available datasets rather than survey responses. 3)…

Can anyone explain how Google Correlate works? I understand how a brute-forced approach might work, but is there any way of optimizing this?

Locality-sensitive hashing should work:

http://www.slaney.org/malcolm/yahoo/Slaney2008-LSHTutorial.p... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Locality-sensitive_hashing

Re: The xkcd survey

#202
post #114
post #4

Found out that gnome 3 has some keybinding for dynamically changing screen resolution. I don't know which keybinding that is, but I found it during the mash the keyboard test.

Did anyone mash about a fifth of the window, select all, copy, then paste until it filled up and then some?

Someone (we?) should do an analysis on how many people did that, when the data comes out.

Re: The xkcd survey

#203

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Really? I thought it was biased toward native USAian speakers. What the fuck is Cilantro?

Technically that's a bias toward Spanish speakers too, since cilantro is just "coriander" in Spanish, usually referring to the leaves.

Technically examples are biased to the specific examples given though they aren't supposed to serve the particular examples in particular.

Re: The xkcd survey

#204
post #150
post #4

Found out that gnome 3 has some keybinding for dynamically changing screen resolution. I don't know which keybinding that is, but I found it during the mash the keyboard test.

I did something that caused Firefox to restart and lose _all_ of my active tabs. (Got them back via sessionstore.bak, thank goodness.)

"How many tabs do you keep open on your browser" would be an interesting question, to me, to see the results on. I'm often mystified by the stories of people who keep 50+ tabs open. I've never understood why, but I guess now that I'm considering it, I'm guessing such people must base their workflows around tabs.

Re: The xkcd survey

#205
post #6

If you like this sort of thing, you may also enjoy: 1) My website Correlated.org ( http://www.correlated.org ), which has been generating weird correlations based on users' survey responses for more than four years. 2) Spurious Correlations ( http://www.tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations ) by Tyler Vigen, which also offers wacky correlations, but based on publicly available datasets rather than survey responses. 3)…

Google Correlate is weirdly fun.

Re: The xkcd survey

#206

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes, I pair them after washing, and curl them after drying. Putting them together makes searching O(n) instead of O(n^2) if you have a particular style in mind. Of course, homogeneity makes this even faster, but you lose the benefit of choice, variability and fashionableness. Quid pro quo.

I think his point was that if you're seeking out all the pairs when you curl them together, you're still spending unnecessary time and effort matching socks, just ahead of time instead of in the moment when you need socks

Exactly he does an O(N^2) Pair followed by a later O(N) search.

Why not do a O(1) Pair folloed by an O(1) Search.

Re: The xkcd survey

#207
post #141

Earlier quoted context omitted.

but if you curl them after drying, you have a much smaller pool to find the pair from, the just washed socks (which will be the socks you use the most anyway). So it's faster that way, than to mix them all up and only then match.

My wife has about twenty pairs of socks, and no more than a few of the pairs are the same variety. It's like some masochistic combinatorics problem every single time I fold socks. My kid and I literally were playing "sock go fish" a few times to get him to help (except ... I was more interested in the pairing, rather than taking turns. Doh.) Laundry-folding happiness is increased significantly when I don't have to pl…

I pretend I am a computer doing a matching problem. I have a buffer of unmatched socks that I compare each sock as I pull it out of the pile, and if unmatched I add to the buffer. Kinda fun.

Re: The xkcd survey

#209

=== SPOILER ALERT! === The most interesting question, to me, is the one about which words you know the meaning of. About half of them aren't real words. I assume this question is used partly as a gauge of vocabulary (how many of the real words do you recognize) and partly of honesty (how many of the fake words do you claim to recognize).

Makes me feel better, then. I consider myself to have a relatively large lexicon, but only knew about 40% of the words.

Re: The xkcd survey

#210
post #204
post #150

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I did something that caused Firefox to restart and lose _all_ of my active tabs. (Got them back via sessionstore.bak, thank goodness.)

"How many tabs do you keep open on your browser" would be an interesting question, to me, to see the results on. I'm often mystified by the stories of people who keep 50+ tabs open. I've never understood why, but I guess now that I'm considering it, I'm guessing such people must base their workflows around tabs.

Vertical tab bars :) It doesn't impede my workflow as if I had that many tabs open on a traditional horizontal bar, so they just accumulate.
Post reply on HN