Looks really awesome!
Thanks! If you end up using telepat and have any questions / feedback, feel free to ping us @ founders@telepat.io
Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
21–30 of 37 posts
Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#22Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#23Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#24Which strategy do you use to sync data? (e.g. in the context of collaborative editing)
Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Thanks! If you end up using telepat and have any questions / feedback, feel free to ping us @ founders@telepat.io
Great work on the architecture documentation. I'm looking at your repos on Github and I'm curious about something. What are you using to test telepat-api, workers, and the integration with all the third party projects listed in the docs?
Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#26Which strategy do you use to sync data? (e.g. in the context of collaborative editing)
Collaborating on different properties of a single object is no problem; for working on the same property we don't do diff/merge yet, it's just FIFO.
Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#27How do they make money?
1) Professional/Consulting services and support for paid users 2) Hosted version (SAAS) 3) Book deal 4) Paid client/server plugins for additional functionality 5) Get "aqui-hired" 6) Enterprise version that's more stable and battle tested 7) etc...
We'll share updates along the road, meanwhile - we're eager to talk to developers that are tackling real-time and refine the product together.
Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#28Hi, for node-only usage, how is this different from Racer[0] (part of DerbyJS)? [0]: https://github.com/derbyjs/racer
Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#29I don't like the fact that the Tux logo is linked to http://linux.com Should be http://kernel.org as linux.com has a spammy feeling..
Re: Telepat: Real-Time, Open Source Data Sync
#30Earlier quoted context omitted.
Collaborating on different properties of a single object is no problem; for working on the same property we don't do diff/merge yet, it's just FIFO.
So if two users are working on the same textfield there is no way to merge their changes at the moment?