Live data from Hacker News

Google’s look, evolved

googleblog.blogspot.com

381–390 of 447 posts

Re: Google’s look, evolved

#381

Wait, what. At roughly the 1:34 mark, the voice pulls up photos of her kid with a pumpkin. Do you have to tag your photos with "pumpkin" first or is the recent "Choose the picture of waffles" in Recaptcha fueling that?

The '"Choose the picture of waffles" in Recaptcha' actually is training a neural network, which then is used to tag your photos.

Re: Google’s look, evolved

#382

Interesting to me is that in the video they use "you can Google it" and "let's Google it". In the past they - apparently - have made pains to avoid using Google as a verb as that's a type of genericisation of the trademark in to a term for internet searching in general.

They've always been fine with people using it as a verb, as long as it's only used to mean searching with Google, not searching in general. That's what would risk genericisation.

Well, in German dictionaries are already listing "to google, searching in the internet for something, more specific, searching in the internet with a search engine, usually Google™."

That pretty much means the trademark is essentially gone.

Re: Google’s look, evolved

#383
post #82
post #58

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Quite the opposite, actually. http://i.imgur.com/bKBcIyX.jpg [1] [1] https://design.google.com/articles/evolving-the-google-ident...

Yes, I said "optical" spacing. Not real spacing. The link you provide is interesting. However, any technical explanation doesn't solve the optical illusion that the last three letters appear to be closer together than the first three letters.

Yes – that’s why normally you use serif fonts and modify the width of the strokes dynamically. Also the reason why the old 'o's were tilted.

Re: Google’s look, evolved

#385
post #301

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It must be cached somewhere within Google, since shift refresh doesn't update the old url and it's https.

favicons cache differently. You either need to enter a different favicon address (favicon.ico?v=2) or reload and restart the browser. I know it's weird, but favicons are weird.

But it's just an image right? Does the browser decide to treat the image different because of the format or the extension? I'm pretty sure you can use png files as favicons if you want.

Anyways I tried it in IE, including restarting it and it still showed the old lowercase g.

Re: Google’s look, evolved

#386

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Why not just run the search straight from your browser's address bar or search field?

Because, for good reason, not everyone has that set to Google?

At least in Firefox, you can search multiple providers from the search bar. I believe other browsers can do this as well.

Re: Google’s look, evolved

#387
post #174
post #6

I love it. Quite often logo redesign processes gets completely out of hand, but this was a significant improvement over the older version: Cleaner, more modern and beautiful in all its simplicity. Bravo!

I don't like it. To me it looks like a doodle a 12 y.o. made and reminds me of comic sans.

That seems like what they're aiming for? Seems to go against the seriousness that they seem to be pulling into android's mechanisms, but it's in line with historic google as a "fun place".
Post reply on HN