Does this apply to "please subscribe to our stupid newsletter" that obscures many sites now?
Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
131–140 of 311 posts
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#132Earlier quoted context omitted.
So what about an OS vendor that "curates" a particular default browser and destroys a competing browser provider in the process? I seem to remember that happening a few years back. It's not so much the curating that's the problem, nobody would care if Duck Duck Go did it, the problem is with the regulators that view Google to be the only curator out there.
Against whom is Google being anti-competitive with this move. How should we prevent this move from being illegal, without specifying what metrics Google is and is not allowed to use?
> without specifying what metrics Google is and is not allowed to use?
Why not? If society depends on something, we regulate it. There are many different possible degrees of regulation, so this is not a boolean condition, even though painting such situations as a boolean choice between pure laissez-faire and nationalizing an industry (instead of merely regulating).
If you don't like this idea, I suggest that Google (or any other business) should find a way on their own to handle the situation (possibly by making their metrics more available, transparent, and verifiable?), or the choice may eventually be taken out of their hands.
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#133Ugh, maybe this will finally push forums to burn those infernal Tapatalk interstitials. Forum owners: I'm looking for one piece of information from a web search, not a whole dumb app that will completely ignore my search goals.
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#134What ad network is it that serves up ads that actually open up the iOS App Store, without having tapped on anything? That's super annoying.
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#135Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh man I miss olga. I had completely forgotten about it. These "newer" sites are the pits and every single one of them does this BS app install crap. Thank goodness for the "View as desktop" button in mobile browsers.
Do we have an idea about their business model? How much do they pay the music labels for the right to display half-quality tabs? I've always assumed the labels asking for money were the reason why there was so much advertising on those sites and why no plain-text site ever survived.
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#136Ugh, maybe this will finally push forums to burn those infernal Tapatalk interstitials. Forum owners: I'm looking for one piece of information from a web search, not a whole dumb app that will completely ignore my search goals.
Tapatalk splash is a sure sign of a phpBB forum, meaning I won't find what I'm looking for anyway. Close tab. I can't believe those forums don't just migrate to Discourse.
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#137Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#138I still do not understand the popularity of this approach. It seems to crazy increase bounce rates. You would think that negative user behavior would already make these undesirable without Google being explicit?
Seems like it would, but the people who bounce probably aren't your most profitable users anyway. I was shocked to learn how effective interstitial popup subscription requests are: http://optinmonster.com/3-reasons-lightbox-popups-capture-mo...
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#139What ad network is it that serves up ads that actually open up the iOS App Store, without having tapped on anything? That's super annoying.
Re: Google Will Soon Start Punishing Mobile Sites that Use Annoying App Install Ads
#140Earlier quoted context omitted.
Tapatalk splash is a sure sign of a phpBB forum, meaning I won't find what I'm looking for anyway. Close tab. I can't believe those forums don't just migrate to Discourse.
well , it's easy , because Discourse is extremely complicated to deploy for the average joe. phpBB is ... in php , ie cheap hosting , sftp deployment ... Server side Ruby was never easy to deploy.