Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'm not clear that it blocks anything by default.
That's correct; Privacy Badger doesn't block anything by default because it doesn't use a blacklist. Instead, it observes the behavior of third-party domains and blocks them based on their behavior. (So it may take a bit of normal browsing before it starts blocking things.) Also, Privacy Badger recently transitioned from beta to 1.0, so if you last tried it more than a month or so ago, I recommend giving it another s…
Ask HN: What's the best ad-blocking, privacy-enhancing extension set up?
61–64 of 64 posts
Re: Ask HN: What's the best ad-blocking, privacy-enhancing extension set up?
#62I use uBlock Origin [1] along with the EFF's Privacy Badger [2]. Hard to say how well it really works for privacy without really digging in to exactly what private info I'm leaking across the web but I haven't seen an ad in ages. [1] https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublock-origin/cjpa... [2] https://www.eff.org/privacybadger
Re: Ask HN: What's the best ad-blocking, privacy-enhancing extension set up?
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
You mean to RSS feeds instead of going to actual websites?
I think mrmondo refers to the "lists" that the ABP-family of extensions support. They are lists of domains and regexes to block, and maintained generally by third parties (not the addon developer). Some of these lists are specific to geographic regions.
Re: Ask HN: What's the best ad-blocking, privacy-enhancing extension set up?
#64> Various forms of fingerprinting are blocked/disabled Be very careful with that. If you're one the few who have the features disabled on a compatible browser, you make your configuration more unique and it becomes easy to identify you. I'd would also advice not to spoof the User-Agent since the browser can be detected thanks to other parameters and if those ones contradict the User-Agent that's a very specific finge…