Practical Uses of CSS3

#1

Post by iiijjjiii » Wed, Dec 23, 2009, 10:16 PM UTC

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#2

Post by walkon » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 3:14 AM UTC

WebKit (Chrome 3) fails on his second input border radius example where all the corners are defined with one attribute:

  -webkit-border-radius: 3px 6px 8px 10px;

Currently, those have to be defined as separate attributes for each corner for this to work. Would this be considered a bug in WebKit? This is their proprietary attribute, so they aren't necessarily supposed to behave as the W3c specifies...

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#3

Post by dcurtis » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 3:17 AM UTC

The internet is such a pile of crap. Why all these things can't work perfectly in every browser is just beyond belief. The W3C is worse than the UN.

As a remember: All of these work great in Webkit. Some of these things don't work right in Firefox (the drop shadows are rendered very badly, for example). And none of them at all work in any type of common IE.

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#4

Post by walkon » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 3:26 AM UTC

dcurtis wrote: post #3

The internet is such a pile of crap. Why all these things can't work perfectly in every browser is just beyond belief. The W3C is worse than the UN. As a remember: All of these work great in Webkit. Some of these things don't work right in Firefox (the drop shadows are rendered very badly, for example). And none of them at all work in any type of common IE.

Which WebKit browser are you using? Chrome 3 in Windows failed on one of his examples (see my other comment).

And yes, very lame that IE gets none of these. None!

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#5

Post by dcurtis » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 3:27 AM UTC

walkon wrote: post #4

dcurtis wrote: post #3

The internet is such a pile of crap. Why all these things can't work perfectly in every browser is just beyond belief. The W3C is worse than the UN. As a remember: All of these work great in Webkit. Some of these things don't work right in Firefox (the drop shadows are rendered very badly, for example). And none of them at all work in any type of common IE.

Which WebKit browser are you using? Chrome 3 in Windows failed on one of his examples (see my other comment). And yes, very lame that IE gets none of these. None!

I use the Webkit Nightlies at http://webkit.org.

Chrome fails at a lot of Webkit standard stuff.

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#6

Post by walkon » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 3:40 AM UTC

dcurtis wrote: post #5

walkon wrote: post #4

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Which WebKit browser are you using? Chrome 3 in Windows failed on one of his examples (see my other comment). And yes, very lame that IE gets none of these. None!

I use the Webkit Nightlies at http://webkit.org . Chrome fails at a lot of Webkit standard stuff.

I thought WebKit's WebCore would be to blame for this and not Chrome. Is it because Chrome (v3) is using outdated versions of WebKit or I am I misunderstanding what WebCore does (very possible)?

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#7

Post by decadentcactus » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 5:04 AM UTC

I'm wondering why most of the larger browser makers don't get together to agree on something. The W3C can clean it up later.

I just don't think it would be too hard for Moz/Webkit team/IE team to agree to support 'border-radius' and other things. Any smaller browsers would catch on soon enough anyway.

Well, getting the IE team to get it to work may be a challenge.

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#8

Post by Tagith » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 6:05 AM UTC

Great article! It's a damn shame it's going to be another decade before we can actually use any of these properties and expect them to work...

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#9

Post by rimantas » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 6:35 AM UTC

Tagith wrote: post #8

Great article! It's a damn shame it's going to be another decade before we can actually use any of these properties and expect them to work...

http://a.deveria.com/caniuse/

Re: Practical Uses of CSS3

#10

Post by bodhi » Thu, Dec 24, 2009, 9:00 AM UTC

decadentcactus wrote: post #7

I'm wondering why most of the larger browser makers don't get together to agree on something. The W3C can clean it up later. I just don't think it would be too hard for Moz/Webkit team/IE team to agree to support 'border-radius' and other things. Any smaller browsers would catch on soon enough anyway. Well, getting the IE team to get it to work may be a challenge.

The W3C CSS working group is the browser makers -- and others -- getting together to agree on something.

http://www.w3.org/Style/CSS/members.php3