See , that's how you manage an open source project , you listen to your community , and yes people can have relevant suggestions. Angular JS became successful because of its pragmatism but also because it allowed more than 1000 people to contribute to its core, not because it was a "Google project" . Everybody knows what other project i'm talking about.
What other project are you talking about?
Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
41–50 of 102 posts
Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#42Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#43Part of migration talk in keynote: https://youtu.be/QHulaj5ZxbI?t=12m43s
Full playlist: https://youtu.be/QHulaj5ZxbI?list=PLOETEcp3DkCoNnlhE-7fovYvq...
Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#44Why isn't there a single domain for the angular project? From what I can see there seems to be 2 main ones: angular.io (for angular 2) and angularjs.org (for angular 1.x) as well as angulardart.org and other sites for angular material design (material.angularjs.org) and angular firebase (firebase.com/docs/web/libraries/angular/). Why not have a single site (or at least a main domain with corresponding subdomains) wit…
> In addition, searching for "angular" in Google provides no obvious distinction between the different sites. You can try to search using DuckDuckGo as it highlights _official sites_. Really useful feature, even for quick one-time searches. https://duckduckgo.com
Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#45Earlier quoted context omitted.
I had always a bad feeling about angular. The first guy I heard talking about it was like "It was made by an underdog at google" and "We often had the feeling about hitting a dead end when developing with it, but it was always because we were using it wrong" which both sounded strange to me. I used ExtJS, Ember and React. And never switched away from them because it wasn't maintained anymore. It just happened that pe…
ExtJS went through some rough upgrade cycles as well. From what I remember, the 2->3 upgrade path covered a small subset of codebases.
Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#46if I'm reading this correctly, they also planning to release a react native competitor? "Native mobile UI. We're enthusiastic about supporting the Web Platform in mobile apps. At the same time, some teams want to deliver fully native UIs on their iOS and Android mobile apps."
Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#47Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#48See , that's how you manage an open source project , you listen to your community , and yes people can have relevant suggestions. Angular JS became successful because of its pragmatism but also because it allowed more than 1000 people to contribute to its core, not because it was a "Google project" . Everybody knows what other project i'm talking about.
What other project are you talking about?
Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#49One of the biggest benefit of Angular is the vast amount of libraries built on it, like bootstrap-ui and ui-grid to name a few, how can we switch to Angular 2 until the most adopted ones don't switch too? (real question)
Re: Angular 1 and Angular 2 integration: the path to seamless upgrade
#50if I'm reading this correctly, they also planning to release a react native competitor? "Native mobile UI. We're enthusiastic about supporting the Web Platform in mobile apps. At the same time, some teams want to deliver fully native UIs on their iOS and Android mobile apps."