An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
ribbonfarm.com
An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
1–10 of 59 posts
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#2> If you want to create something heavy like the Higgs boson, you have to hit the > Higgs field with a sufficiently large (and sufficiently concentrated) burst of > energy to give the field the necessary one quantum of energy.)
So when the LHC creates a spike of energy at a point large enough to create a Higgs boson, why does that energy interact with the Higgs field and get "used up" by other fields? In other words, if Higgs requires 100 units of energy and electrons require 1, why do we get 1 Higgs boson and not 100 electrons?
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#3One of the questions I am struggling to find a satisfying answer for for quite some time. Depends on whom you ask? We can't tell because both ways of thinking are completely equivalent? Fields are real! No, they are just a tool! Are there issues with real fields forming a preferred reference frame? Does somebody know? (My current understanding seems to suggest that fields are just a tool.)
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#4Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#5Are quantum fields actual elements of reality or just a convenient mathematical tool to deal with many particle systems? One of the questions I am struggling to find a satisfying answer for for quite some time. Depends on whom you ask? We can't tell because both ways of thinking are completely equivalent? Fields are real! No, they are just a tool! Are there issues with real fields forming a preferred reference frame?…
Depending on the field of science/engineering and the specific application, one might choose to work with electromagnetic fields, photons or a combination of both.
In the QFT framework, a photon is merely a quanta of the electromagnetic field. So photon based or EM field based approaches are just two ways of dealing with problems. Neither is more or less 'real' than the other.
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#6This is a great article. One thing I don't understand: the author says: > If you want to create something heavy like the Higgs boson, you have to hit the > Higgs field with a sufficiently large (and sufficiently concentrated) burst of > energy to give the field the necessary one quantum of energy.) So when the LHC creates a spike of energy at a point large enough to create a Higgs boson, why does that energy interact…
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#7Well, somewhat. Now it's in the form of Higgs field. Unlike ether, Higgs field does not interact with uniformly moving particles, only those that are accelerating.
Here's a great book I just recently listened: http://www.amazon.com/The-Black-Hole-War-Mechanics/dp/031601...
It's by Leonard Susskind from Stanford. The thoughts experiments in the book are just terrific. Loved it.
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#8This is a pretty good introduction. I highly recommend Feynman's book "QED: The Strange Theory of Light and Matter" as an excellent in-depth work that does not sacrifice accuracy for the sake of making difficult ideas understandable. It is both very clear to the layperson and accurate to the physics.
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#9Are quantum fields actual elements of reality or just a convenient mathematical tool to deal with many particle systems? One of the questions I am struggling to find a satisfying answer for for quite some time. Depends on whom you ask? We can't tell because both ways of thinking are completely equivalent? Fields are real! No, they are just a tool! Are there issues with real fields forming a preferred reference frame?…
I don't know how to answer the relativistic questions of fields yet. For that one would need to learn a lot of Quantum Field Theory.
For the layman, however, these two links are very informative:
http://www.symmetrymagazine.org/article/july-2013/real-talk-... http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/blogs/physics/2013/08/the-good-...
Re: An Introduction to Quantum Field Theory
#10This is a great article. One thing I don't understand: the author says: > If you want to create something heavy like the Higgs boson, you have to hit the > Higgs field with a sufficiently large (and sufficiently concentrated) burst of > energy to give the field the necessary one quantum of energy.) So when the LHC creates a spike of energy at a point large enough to create a Higgs boson, why does that energy interact…