Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

news.ycombinator.com

161–170 of 250 posts

Re: Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

#161

I want a web browser that let me open multiple accounts of a similar site at once.

I've always thought the same. It'd be great to have a browser that allowed fully independent sessions to be running simulataneously

Firefox can do this with separate profiles too, so long as you also include --no-remote with other instances.

Re: Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

#162
* Speed!

* Something other than javascript as a compilation target when using something else for those of us allergic to JS (scalajs.) I've only looked at it briefly but WebAssembly looks like a good candidate for this

* Less feature bloat, remove as many features as possible from the browser core and leave any non essential feature to plugins.

Re: Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

#164
post #145
post #120

- works on X, the terminal and Android (yeah, that's a tall order, but it sure would be nice to have the same keystrokes available in X and on the terminal, and the same information available everywhere) - securely shares passwords across multiple hosts (emphasis on 'securely,' unlike Chrome and Firefox) - blocks ads - blocks JavaScript, but makes it very easy to selectively enable it - supports , and (hey, you did a…

Wait, what's insecure about Chrome password syncing?

I use firefox, but if I remember correctly the passwords are stored in plain text? And there is no global password to protect the saved password.

Re: Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

#165
post #95

The fast way to handle 20-200 tabs. Something like built in tab search, with tab caching.

Firefox does something like that. If you start typing the name of the site you want, it will find the tab you already have open and give you a "switch to this tab" option.

It's how I survived with 600+ tabs in Firefox ;-)

Re: Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

#167

I'd like a strong "project" concept: a project could be a set of multi-tab windows, there'd be fast switching between projects and fast tab selection based on projects. Most computers nowadays have a lot of RAM and people use lots of tabs. It seems wrong that one resorts to public browser extensions to find ways to navigate through the tabs. Possibly also tree-like relationships between tabs so that subtrees of tabs…

Doesnt Vivaldi allow groupimg of tabs under one group? I guess they also give you shortcuts to navigate more easily in that subset.

Re: Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

#168
post #66

Should work on an Atom 270 netbook without lagging. Currently I have to use either dillo or Opera 12.something.

Try NetSurf, if you haven't already. It's not perfect but it's a bit faster than Dillo is. (The build process feels a little wobbly to get used to but it honestly takes 3-5 minutes to build.)

I used Dillo between 209 and 2012 on an old 800MHz AMD box. It was really nice... being able to resume from hibernation, have 800 tabs open, and have a hyper-responsive machine. :D

Re: Ask HN: What would you want in an ideal web browser?

#169
Mostly security, privacy and usability related stuff. Here's a quite long list:

* Browser written in a way that prevents most exploits.

* Built-in Javascript and cross-domain request blocking.

* Single-process sandboxed browser where only the active tab is allowed to run.

* Tab content written to disk so it can be restored in the event of a crash or running out of battery.

* Ability to "swap out" tabs to disk so they consume no memory.

* Ability to freeze all javascript code on a tab temporarily.

* Deep searching of history (i.e. page content).

* Created by a privacy-friendly organization/people who aren't trying to spy on you.

* Avoid doing things automatically (download files to a folder, search for misspelled URLs, send URL to Google when typing it in, etc). Don't have keyboard shortcuts that are hard to undo (also, don't have single-key letter/number shortcuts at all).

* Don't have an over-engineered build process. The browser should be possible to build (not necessarily fast) on an old or low-end computer.

Post reply on HN