Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
1–10 of 98 posts
Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#2Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#3That said, the technological explanation sounds simple and solid. Why aren't cameras doing that already?
Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#4What's with the completely useless thumbnail at the bottom? That said, the technological explanation sounds simple and solid. Why aren't cameras doing that already?
Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#5What's with the completely useless thumbnail at the bottom? That said, the technological explanation sounds simple and solid. Why aren't cameras doing that already?
I wondered the same; it takes two hyperlinks to get to the project's home page where they have a larger version. http://web.media.mit.edu/~hangzhao/modulo.html
Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#6Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#7Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#8I still try to just expose "properly" for the effect I want and shoot RAW to give me a little leeway in tweaking shadows and highlights but I'd be interested in trying out software that uses this technique if only for something new to mess with.
Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#9Re: Unbounded High Dynamic Range Photography Using a Modulo Camera
#10This is a "computer scientists" understanding of photography, and this phrase alone can even be seen as "dangerous" by photographers. There's more to aperture size and exposure length than "how much light reaches the sensor", like focus, depth of field, motion blur and bokeh, to name a few, that is not aknowledged by that understanding. The technology is good, but it won't change the way photographers deal with photography, at best, it will give them a better tool to work with.
I also wonder how much impact this could have. Foveon Inc. had developed a great sensor that was going to be revolutionary, about 20 years ago. Today only Sigma uses it, and the UX is so bad in those cameras that the (very good) technology they had their hands on never got a chance to shine.
Also, is this implementation very different from having a 16-bit ADC in normal sensors? The end results would be the same: higher dynamic range. And the increase in bits seems a lot closer (because it would mean little changes to the current manufacture processes) than a whole new type of sensor being use in cameras.