Hangouts is "okay" at best. I continue to be amazed that companies like Microsoft and Google are so bad at instant messaging that upstarts like Slack can eat their lunch with essentially hosted IRC and a pretty client.
Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
41–50 of 110 posts
Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#42And here I was excited thinking that they'd finally fixed the terrible performance and interface of the browser app.
Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#43Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#44Earlier quoted context omitted.
The convenience of being able to use several devices (laptop, tablet, phone) to seamlessly continue conversations is pretty much the main reason I like these services. Pidgin and Adium do not support (transferrable) chat history and do not show messages when I'm offline, which is a huge usability hit. Especially when people talking on the other side expect that the messages are visible to you even if you're not immed…
> Pidgin and Adium do not support (transferrable) chat history and do not show messages when I'm offline, which is a huge usability hit. This times a million. GChat (now "hangouts"), though their XMPP interface, attempts to send new messages only to the "active" client, which means that if you try to use Pidgin or Adium (I used both myself for a number of years; they're fantastic applications) or any other XMPP clien…
Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#45Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#46Well, that would be quite a feat if they managed to make it less reliable. The latest version I tried to use was ridiculously buggy, crashing, couldn't join a conversation etc. I was so boggled by how bad it was (Google's app, on Google's OS) I even forgot to be angry for a while
Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#47Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not use Pidgin or Adium?
The convenience of being able to use several devices (laptop, tablet, phone) to seamlessly continue conversations is pretty much the main reason I like these services. Pidgin and Adium do not support (transferrable) chat history and do not show messages when I'm offline, which is a huge usability hit. Especially when people talking on the other side expect that the messages are visible to you even if you're not immed…
Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#48Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not use Pidgin or Adium?
The convenience of being able to use several devices (laptop, tablet, phone) to seamlessly continue conversations is pretty much the main reason I like these services. Pidgin and Adium do not support (transferrable) chat history and do not show messages when I'm offline, which is a huge usability hit. Especially when people talking on the other side expect that the messages are visible to you even if you're not immed…
Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#49Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why not use Pidgin or Adium?
The convenience of being able to use several devices (laptop, tablet, phone) to seamlessly continue conversations is pretty much the main reason I like these services. Pidgin and Adium do not support (transferrable) chat history and do not show messages when I'm offline, which is a huge usability hit. Especially when people talking on the other side expect that the messages are visible to you even if you're not immed…
Re: Google Hangouts 4.0: now simpler, faster, more beautiful
#50Can I actively control my visibility settings, as with every other IM client? Inability to control my own visibility makes Hangouts an absolute non-starter for me, and many other people that I talk to. Our only choice is to keep it turned off at all times. Which is a shame, because Google Chat used to be my go-to messaging client.