Earlier quoted context omitted.
The article provides historical context and a framework to think about the question. I think it does a better job answering the question than your last 2 paragraphs.
The article tries to backdoor an emotionally resonant populist political view in the guise of concern. If you think it does a good job answering the question, that probably just means that you have a converging viewpoint.
Life is shit, eat Arby's. Am I following along?