Modern ClojureScript
github.com
Modern ClojureScript
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#2How is there no mention of Om[1] or Reagent[2]?
[1] https://github.com/omcljs/om [2] https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#3How is there no mention of Om[1] or Reagent[2]? [1] https://github.com/omcljs/om [2] https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent
Most of it was written 2+ years ago
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#4I really liked Living Clojure.
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#5also aphyr's clojure from the ground up has great exercises at the end of each post.
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#6I really liked Living Clojure. http://shop.oreilly.com/product/0636920034292.do
agreed
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#7also aphyr's clojure from the ground up has great exercises at the end of each post. https://aphyr.com/tags/Clojure-from-the-ground-up
Aphyr is awesome [0], but Clojure from the Ground Up isn't focused on ClojureScript, and the use cases for Clojure and ClojureScript are different in meaningful ways, e.g. dependencies and REPL connections and working with HTTP and browsers. What I like about this set of tutorials is that it covers a lot of different pieces if the ecosystem together in one place.
[0]: Just naming Jepson "Jepson" would have been enough.
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#8If you already know Clojurescript and Reagent reasonably well, I am very taken with re-frame[1] as a UI "framework." The readme is epic, but a great walkthrough of the framework and the reasons behind it. It achieves the same goals as Flux, but because it's cljs things end up being more functional, more powerful, and less verbose. :)
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#9also aphyr's clojure from the ground up has great exercises at the end of each post. https://aphyr.com/tags/Clojure-from-the-ground-up
Aphyr is awesome [0], but Clojure from the Ground Up isn't focused on ClojureScript, and the use cases for Clojure and ClojureScript are different in meaningful ways, e.g. dependencies and REPL connections and working with HTTP and browsers. What I like about this set of tutorials is that it covers a lot of different pieces if the ecosystem together in one place. [0]: Just naming Jepson "Jepson" would have been enoug…
True....Living Clojure isn't focused on just ClojureScript either.
Re: Modern ClojureScript
#10This page is vastly dated