Earlier quoted context omitted.
> And? Does that give your argument more weight? Yes because he is potentially one from the target audience of this. If somebody isn't willing to put in the tiny bit of effort to learn the tiny bit of english required for programming, they're not willing to put in the huge amount of effort that is required to learn programming anyways. We have enough horribly documented code that needs maintenance, there is no need t…
> Yes because he is potentially one from the target audience of this. No, because he already knows English. The proclamation "We should tax the rich less" is a self-serving sentence whether it comes from someone who was born into wealth, or it comes from someone who became rich later in life. > If somebody isn't willing to put in the tiny bit of effort to learn the tiny bit of english required for programming, they'r…
And he didn't have to learn it at some point?
My english was pretty much nonexistent until I picked up programming.
Like I said below, nobody is arguing against beginner languages/tools like scratch and logo that could essentially be programmed in emoji, for what it's worth.
But people are arguing against "real" programming languages being translated, because that's a waste of everyones time.