281–285 of 285 posts
Earlier quoted context omitted.
I were just drunk and idea seemed funny. That's the idea behind haha. But either way can't wait to see google ai overview cite us.
>But either way can't wait to see google ai overview cite us. Even if it (unintentionally!) misleads and hurts someone?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Many LLMs are surprisingly good at using specific named authors (rather than just example texts) to evoke a style, so you could try "in the style of Jorge Luis Borges" or "…Douglas Adams" or "…Robert Anton Wilson" – whose surreal/absurd/fantastic styles could be fertile seeds. (If not already familiar with Borges, definitely check out his 'Tlön, Uqbar, Orbis Tertius' and 'Library of Babel' as inspiration.) While "eac…
Nice! I'm thinking on how can I make it more interactive. Those author styles could work well, will check that out. Btw how would you imagine such dispute? What do you think could be the trigger for the article to be regenerated?
* readers can request reviews from certain perspectives: "new discovery", "historic reinterpretation", etc. The reviews specifically search for related sibling articles, and seek to create ever-larger areas of consistency. (The same prompt admonition against "nothing actually true" could be paired with "but other Halupedia articles are diegetically true"
* a background process clusters articles, and picks pairs within some neighborhood for dual-harmonization - where they avoid contradictions & adopt meaningful (& deep-anchor) cross-links to each others' sections. Repeated, or to the extent contexts allow expansion of synchronized revision to N-tuples of articles, this creates a tropism towards a shared (un)reality.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Interesting idea with flagging. We are considering 2 options: 1. You can generate aricle only if it was previously referenced in previous one 2. Flagging mechanism, now that you brought it up. Let me know what you think!
I lean towards a variant of option 1: you can only generate an article that was previously referenced. But arbitrary phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, can be highlighted and used to form a new article. Yes this may mean that there are pages for common words like "and" Yes this may mean that there's a page for letters like "x" Filtering what ends up becoming a hyperlink becomes a problem that I think can be sol…