I'm all for egalitarianism in the public sphere, but in private I still believe that there's such a thing as natural born talent. Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. But if your goal is to maximize your output having already accepted that your time on earth is limited, then the wise thing is to probably steer in directions that have high impact but for you feel dispropor…
> Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. At any given time, only the 5% of the population can reach the top 5% in any area. If anybody could do it and e.g. just 10% did it, then there would be a new 5% (the top 50% of that 10%), and the rest 50% wouldn't be in. > Thus, I'm a big fan of Peter Theils advice to work on things that satisfy the property that: "if you weren't wor…
Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
81–90 of 460 posts
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#82These fokes devoted quite some time into thinking about your problem: https://80000hours.org/ From their homepage: "You have 80,000 hours in your career. Make the right career choices, and you can help solve the world’s most pressing problems, as well as have a more rewarding, interesting life. We’re here to give you the information you need to find that fulfilling, high-impact career. Our advice is all free, tailore…
This means giving 10% of my income to cost-effective charities that help other individuals is entirely within my means.
Over the years, within the Effective Altruism (EA) community I have met amazing people - devoting their lives to solving important, neglected problems, people who give 50% of their income to help others, and more. I'm consistently inspired by them to do more - and it makes life a thrill.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#83These fokes devoted quite some time into thinking about your problem: https://80000hours.org/ From their homepage: "You have 80,000 hours in your career. Make the right career choices, and you can help solve the world’s most pressing problems, as well as have a more rewarding, interesting life. We’re here to give you the information you need to find that fulfilling, high-impact career. Our advice is all free, tailore…
But it was very anti-climax and frustrating for me when they announced that their problem was to help other people find their problem. Too... comfortable solution I guess, I don't know. Not judging their choice here, just stating that as an expectator, from an entertainment point of view, it was frustrating.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'll skip over what I'm actively working on because I think this deserves a mention: I'm a hobbyist digital archivist. This is something where most people can likely make a meaningful and long-lasting impact, that nobody else could if they didn't. Archiving, for me, is a way of travelling forward in time. Think about "time capsules" and what not. Here's what I mean by this: If you write a message on a piece of paper,…
I tend to do the same with all physical pieces of paper I receive, whether or not it feels useful at the time. Recently added OCR to the process, which makes retrieval a joy. I have no logical reason for doing this, it feels like a compulsion. Why do you do it and what tools do you use?
To travel in time :) And also because I believe human knowledge is the sum of the past it can learn from. If information gets lost, it can't be part of that. It's the same beliefs that drive me to support open source & free software.
> what tools do you use?
I do a lot of data-mining as part of my day to day operations, in video games mainly. These are the main things I end up archiving, so I write my own tools.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#85The focus should not be on "what," but on "why." I just got this advice the other day and it's liberated my thinking. I was (am) stuck in a rut believing that if I just find something I am passionate about it would alleviate the sense of purposelessness that pervades. Not so. Some people can work just for material benefit to themselves and their families. However, eventually that juice runs out because money is just…
> Some people can work just for material benefit to themselves and their families. However, eventually that juice runs out because money is just not useful beyond a point. Admittedly, material benefit to myself and my family isn't the only reason I work. However, the argument that "money is just not useful beyond a point" isn't a strong one in my mind. I'm in my late forties right now and make a reasonable sum of mon…
Of course, buying more expensive things and increasing your income is still a good feeling, but after some time they become status quo and your happiness is back at the same level as it was before the pay raise (especially since there are now new, more expensive things to seek).
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#86I'm all for egalitarianism in the public sphere, but in private I still believe that there's such a thing as natural born talent. Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. But if your goal is to maximize your output having already accepted that your time on earth is limited, then the wise thing is to probably steer in directions that have high impact but for you feel dispropor…
> Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. I seriously doubt that. People who have no aptitude in a field, even if they are dedicated, will be competing vs people who are also dedicated, but have the aptitude. I'd say maybe that "almost anyone can reach top 50% of most non-athletic fields", but definitely not top 5%.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Anyone can probably reach the top 5% in most non-athletic areas given enough time. I seriously doubt that. People who have no aptitude in a field, even if they are dedicated, will be competing vs people who are also dedicated, but have the aptitude. I'd say maybe that "almost anyone can reach top 50% of most non-athletic fields", but definitely not top 5%.
Depends on what you base the percentage on. If it is the global population, then 5% of 7 billion is 350 million. So to be in the top 5% there must be at most 350 million people better than you. Now consider a niche sport, say Ultimate Frisbee. I would guess that much less than 350 million people even know the rules. So invest an hour to learn the rules and play it a little with your friends. Voila, you are in the top…
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#88a) What thing doesn't exist and you've noticed it hasn't existed for ages? A lack of the thing being both apparent and long-term is how you can assume that nobody else is going to do it.
b) What thing that nobody else is going to do can you do? Me, I definitely can't invent a new kind of battery, but I can apply my ADHD and ASD quirks to a certain kind of civic tech problem that involves pushing a gigantic and annoying rock of data up a hill _once_, then spending hardly any time per project keeping it ticking over.
c) What thing that doesn't exist and which you can do needs doing? My field is regularly jostled around by some kid or other whose "startup" barges in, makes a pile of noise, never makes a dime, stinks up the water some, then vanishes without trace. I get the feeling that jumping into things without adequate consideration for the potential harm is likely not your largest problem [ :) ] but other people will be reading this page.
The first civic tech thing I did (kildarestreet.com) is a searchable transcript of everything that happens in the Irish parliament. It didn't exist when I moved here 14 years ago, it really did need to because the official version of the same data was -- some would say purposefully -- utterly unusable, and I'd just moved over from the UK where the original version of the same app (theyworkforyou.com) was A Thing That People Use A Lot. I was able to put it together -- perhaps would not have if I'd known I'd be rewriting all the parsers for a third time ten years later -- with my skill set, and critically, very obviously nobody else was going to get it done. There's all my tickboxes for whether this is worth spending time on.
d) I should add here that "is it practically possible to do" factors here because I got into this whole thing trying to build something else entirely. Ireland did not have a way for me as a new resident to find out which electoral district I lived in, and thus who represented me at local and national level. In the UK writetothem.com from the same people as made the other stuff tells you this when you enter a postcode on the homepage and simply choose not to write someone a letter. That's what I tried to do first, in an itch-scratching manner. But it stalled because there was in 2006 no way to convert an address to a geo point without spending €72000/yr so eventually, irritated by that, I moved down the list to the lowest-hanging fruit instead. So also, don't spend forever trying to do the undoable.
You'll notice none of this mentions how in the fuck you pay your rent. I do other things and take donations. Some people start companies. Some are grant-aided. Some are just rich to start with. But this isn't strictly what you asked :D
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#89If it helps, energy really really should be worked on. Do that. Also, that's not really how regrets work. You will be comparing the path you took to what you imagine to be the roads not taken. It's very dependent on your own unique experiences and outlook, and very hard to safeguard against. Your way of evaluating your life will change over time, so optimising for your current values gives no guarantees. Best thing t…
Thinking of alternative paths you could have taken might be a fun exercise or could yeild insights to make better future choices, but if you chose the best you could, there is no sense in regretting a choice, even when that choice hurt.
Re: Ask HN: How did you decide what problems to solve in your lifetime?
#90Goal: Learn how to do even that which I can't properly understand at face value today.
Conclusions: I do not want to work in hardware. I do not want to work in life-dependent hardware.
Hardware is hard, and I want the freedom to experiment with new software ideas without having to consider who may die / be injured. You can usually undo mission critical faults with money but you can't replace a life.
Unfortunately, I don't know how I came to these conclusions other than meeting with lots of people. I get a bad taste in my mouth when I see people who go off to location X in the world to help solve Y. I just don't see myself committing to that location and would prefer to attack things in a way that can solve them worldwide.