You have to use a special "verbatim" search product from Google, it isn't the main search box anymore. Look under Advanced or something.
Why would they make their very expected functionality something you have to dig around to find now? That just seems like really bad decision making that should have been spotted by someone on top and screams that the people on top are now disconnected from reality. I swear that it used to work for certain strings I'm trying to find now which I was able to find information on and now it isn't even returning, with "ver…
Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
71–80 of 219 posts
Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#72>>>>Search for a domain name with quotation marks for example just recombines the contents of the domain and returns a bunch of unrelated content
I believe if you search for site:domaingoeshere.com yourqueryhere
That will spit out results only from that domain. I think that still works ?
Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#73Kagi. Never have I been so happy to send someone $10 every month. When you become the customer, not the product, it’s amazing what can happen.
Fuck google, I have work to do. Thanks for the tip! Nice realizing that they've basically been wasting my time for a while now and that there's a decent alternative available.
Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#74> I used this quite frequently but since Google """"improved"""" it last year (there was a popular HN post complaining about this) it doesn't work anymore That's not my experience? The quotes still seem to work for me? Do you have a specific example? And / or can you point to said HN post?
Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#75Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#76Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would they make their very expected functionality something you have to dig around to find now? That just seems like really bad decision making that should have been spotted by someone on top and screams that the people on top are now disconnected from reality. I swear that it used to work for certain strings I'm trying to find now which I was able to find information on and now it isn't even returning, with "ver…
It's also possible they they're correct, and the average user of today has much less need for verbatim searches than the average user when the search engine was first designed.
Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would they make their very expected functionality something you have to dig around to find now? That just seems like really bad decision making that should have been spotted by someone on top and screams that the people on top are now disconnected from reality. I swear that it used to work for certain strings I'm trying to find now which I was able to find information on and now it isn't even returning, with "ver…
It's also possible they they're correct, and the average user of today has much less need for verbatim searches than the average user when the search engine was first designed.
Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#79Kagi. Never have I been so happy to send someone $10 every month. When you become the customer, not the product, it’s amazing what can happen.
Re: Ask HN: How to do literal web searches after Google destroyed the “ ” feature?
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why would they make their very expected functionality something you have to dig around to find now? That just seems like really bad decision making that should have been spotted by someone on top and screams that the people on top are now disconnected from reality. I swear that it used to work for certain strings I'm trying to find now which I was able to find information on and now it isn't even returning, with "ver…
It's also possible they they're correct, and the average user of today has much less need for verbatim searches than the average user when the search engine was first designed.
If they break a key feature to MAKE a verbatim search happen with literally two keys pressed, and are apparently not even indexing what they used to anymore, they're dropping the ball. Most people know the quotation trick now and are probably assuming it still works