Earlier quoted context omitted.
Looks like the conflict thesis and Draper's work have been discredited. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conflict_thesis
So you ignore all the things that you were clearly wrong on to pick a particular item you could criticize for. That doesn't sound exactly fair. Furthermore your criticism is itself weak. You drew a parallel between what I said and a discredited version of the history. Well fine. But that discredited version of the history was not at all what I was saying. What I was saying is that Christianity can't validly claim cre…
I, on the other hand, refer to Stark's work, which is state of the art as far as I know.
Most of modern science was founded by religious people. This seems very odd if there is an intrinsic conflict between religion and science.
To avoid a lot of back and forth, what credible modern scholar can you cite to back up your point of view?