Earlier quoted context omitted.
> It doesn't make sense that married people can willfully lower standard of living but non custodial parents cannot. Of course it does - because both parents are responsible for the welfare of the children, and so if they both decide that they want to lower the standard of living that is a shared/joint agreement. If the non-custodial parent decides they want to lower their child's standard of living, a) that is a uni…
>Of course it does - because both parents are responsible for the welfare of the children, and so if they both decide that they want to lower the standard of living that is a shared/joint agreement. So a couple points here 1) we've now moved the goal posts, we went from the child needs the same standard of living, to now it is OK to lower it if both decide, to whatever extent that happens in dual custody situations.…
When you’re not married anymore, I’m in favor of the idea of making it easier to change child support payments in situations where things are amicable and jointly agreed to. I am very much aware that is not the situation today.
My point about losing flexibility is that when you have kids, your choices are not your own anymore. You can say all you want that they need “necessities”, but I know from experience that the way people interpret that varies widely. I think the only fair way to do it is to keep QOL as the goal. If you want more accountability as to how the money is spent, sure, though I’m not sure how that would work in practice.