If you have working access keys, you can generate a console URL that has the same permission as your keys. Check out the python script here: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/IAM/latest/UserGuide/id_roles_pr... It will spit out a URL you can use to sign into the console using the keys instead of a user account. Maybe this will help you in the meantime while you are trying to fix the root problem. Good luck!
One other thought is to try using rclone to copy all of your data to local storage or to another provider while you still have access using keys. https://rclone.org/
Ask HN: AWS account suspended, able to access via keys with no console signin
21–27 of 27 posts
Re: Ask HN: AWS account suspended, able to access via keys with no console signin
#22Earlier quoted context omitted.
The odds of your hardware failing are much higher than the odds of having a problem leading to data loss with AWS.
Mmm, but the 5 9s of reliability probably don’t take into account their odds of terminating your account abruptly. Maybe they should. Every account they unilaterally shutdown without access to data should just count against their reliability metrics as if it were an indefinite outage.
Re: Ask HN: AWS account suspended, able to access via keys with no console signin
#23Since you have your keys working, you may be able to open a support case using the support API: https://docs.aws.amazon.com/awssupport/latest/user/about-sup... :)
Re: Ask HN: AWS account suspended, able to access via keys with no console signin
#24Earlier quoted context omitted.
Mmm, but the 5 9s of reliability probably don’t take into account their odds of terminating your account abruptly. Maybe they should. Every account they unilaterally shutdown without access to data should just count against their reliability metrics as if it were an indefinite outage.
Definitely agree with this completely. If you can't pay for egress then that is effectively just losing data. I get the business argument, but cutting me off from easily speaking to support is absolute fucking garbage. Shameful process.
It's not. It's for obvious safety reasons. How can you prove that you are the rightful account owner otherwise?
Re: Ask HN: AWS account suspended, able to access via keys with no console signin
#25Earlier quoted context omitted.
Definitely agree with this completely. If you can't pay for egress then that is effectively just losing data. I get the business argument, but cutting me off from easily speaking to support is absolute fucking garbage. Shameful process.
> cutting me off from easily speaking to support is absolute fucking garbage It's not. It's for obvious safety reasons. How can you prove that you are the rightful account owner otherwise?
Re: Ask HN: AWS account suspended, able to access via keys with no console signin
#26Earlier quoted context omitted.
Definitely agree with this completely. If you can't pay for egress then that is effectively just losing data. I get the business argument, but cutting me off from easily speaking to support is absolute fucking garbage. Shameful process.
> cutting me off from easily speaking to support is absolute fucking garbage It's not. It's for obvious safety reasons. How can you prove that you are the rightful account owner otherwise?
How can you prove that you are the rightful account owner at all under those circumstances?
Re: Ask HN: AWS account suspended, able to access via keys with no console signin
#27> I have buckets that I've had backed up for literally a decade and losing this would be unbelievable. Why would you store everything only at AWS...?
How is this constructive to what OP asked? I don't think OP should answer you, because if they do instead of people addressing their actual issue, it will become an irrelevant rabbit-hole discussing backup best practices or the cost-effectiveness of AWS's various data storage solutions. Personally I've seen AWS's S3 Glacier commonly recommended including in Ask HN or Reddit's data hoarder sub. Therefore, that is a go…
Yes, but that does not mean you should only store there.