Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

news.ycombinator.com

21–30 of 221 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#21
Tokyo!

Pros:

- Safe almost everywhere even at night and generally very clean

- Infinite amount of things to do, you'll never finish exploring new restaurants (with delicious food) and stores

- International events happen there: conferences, concerts, etc.

- Very walkable (including the metro), especially around city center

- Reasonable housing prices - high, but comparable to cities in the US

- Politeness is baked into society and unpleasant interactions with strangers are very rare

- Rest of the country is fairly accessible by train for a weekend trip, and there's plenty of beautiful nature if you get out of the city

Cons:

- Difficult language and few people speak any English

- Fairly closed society/culture, you'll always be an outsider (but there are plenty of expats)

- Toilets in restaurants often suck and public trash cans are rare

- Bureaucracy is quite bad and inaccessible if you aren't fluent in Japanese

- Work culture is bad, though being remote could make that a non-issue

Some runner ups:

- Lisbon (excellent weather, low prices)

- Copenhagen (super safe, great quality of life)

For me though, the top 3 criteria by far are 1) a lot to do, 2) very safe, and 3) don't need a car, and Tokyo is pretty much the only major city that meets those.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#22
post #14

Somewhere in the middle of nowhere. I currently live in a small town in the mountains. Love the mountain aspect of it. The townspeople are progressive in some ways (they try to be 'woke'), but extremely regressive when it comes to development (NIMBYism on steroids). Housing is a major problem, all the restaurants are shit, nothing gets built pretty much ever, most of the tax burden is on the few businesses there are,…

OP is most certainly talking about software development jobs being 100% remote...not all jobs being 100% remote.

Ah gotcha. Saw the title and thought more philosophically about it. Missed that line. I mean, for me, 100% remote is more or less reality (choose not to take a job that restricts me geographically, have some side hustles).

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#26
I've been thinking about this a lot. My criteria:

- Warm winters

- Sunny (>200 avg. sunny days)

- Good music scene

- Good tech scene (for meeting other founders)

- Beautiful nature nearby

- Reasonable cost of living

- In the US

Based on these criteria, I think I've landed on Austin, Texas as the best option. Here are other places I considered, though:

- California: L.A. or San Francisco would honestly be my top choices, but the high income tax rates push the cost too high.

- Phoenix: A cool city, but my perception is that its music and tech scenes are not as vibrant as Austin's. Also, I don't think the desert is very beautiful.

- Nashville: In a lot of ways it's like Austin, but smaller. It's still one of my top picks right now because it's closer to my family, but I'm leaning toward Austin because winters in Nashville are still relatively cold.

- Miami: This city excels in all of my criteria except for the music scene, which appears to be severely lacking. So, that takes it out of the running.

- Denver: Meets a lot of my criteria and seems beautiful, but I think its winters are too cold.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#27
post #14

Somewhere in the middle of nowhere. I currently live in a small town in the mountains. Love the mountain aspect of it. The townspeople are progressive in some ways (they try to be 'woke'), but extremely regressive when it comes to development (NIMBYism on steroids). Housing is a major problem, all the restaurants are shit, nothing gets built pretty much ever, most of the tax burden is on the few businesses there are,…

Off topic but [maybe] relevant...

> Somewhere in the middle of nowhere.

A part of me too desires this. For a software engineer, what you need most is good network connectivity, which is now possible in many places.

The other part of me is convinced that would not be a good move in the long run. If I move away from the city, my kids' education will suffer, my mother (who also lives with me) will lose the social connect that keeps her in good spirits. Growing up in a small place, I always longed to move to a city. Now that I have "been there done that" in terms of living a city life, I do not want my children to go through the same cycle.

It would be nice to have the best of both worlds. Have a second home someplace remote, and go live there for short duration as circumstances permit.

Post reply on HN