uBlacklist is a great tool to block sites you don't want from showing up on your search results on google (and a couple others including bing and duckduckgo). It supports regular expressions as well, I use /pinterest\..*/ to block all pinterest-related content. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/ublacklist/ https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/ublacklist/pncfbmi...
There's also Personal Blocklist, which appends a small "block site.etc" under every google search result. If there is a site that is clogging up your search results, just click it and it's gone. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/personal-bloc...
Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
151–160 of 323 posts
Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#152Not only mirroring SO, also its siblings (like serverfault and askubuntu), and others like GitHub.
But the most annoying part is it keeps showing those mirrored and machine translated stuffs that offers little to none benefits to me and I'm already being forced trained enough to identify those at first glance.
Those even shows up when I'm already searching in other languages, ahrr.
edit: formatting
Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#153Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#154Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#155IMHO the biggest offender: https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/ They are making me insane with the modal login demand. I wonder if Google has downgraded the authoritative standing of StackOverflow?
Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#156Earlier quoted context omitted.
I'd blame gooogle more than the website, since google search results are generally getting worse and less relevant
Totally. This is a exactly what I was thinking about yesterday in the thread where someone was asking if Google results were getting worse. There's no reason the official docs for Python should be lower in the results than a shitty docs clone / spam site when searching for a common package/function in the standard library.
If Google still used/respected the original page rank algo, the official docs would never be ranked lower than a spammy clone site. I just wish they reverted back to the "power of the crowd" algo, let each node vote with their links and reputation.
Nowadays I almost stopped using Google completely. I first noticed it with torrent/streaming censorship ~5 years ago, then the political/ideological censorship started to feel unbearable. I just want my search engine to show me the most relevant results BASED ON THE QUERY I SUBMITTED. No moral judgement crap.
My search stack nowadays is a mix o Bing, ddg, Yandex and if everything else failed, Google. It's a sad reality.
Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#157Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#158Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#159Earlier quoted context omitted.
One of the problems with things like this is how do you know which site has copied from another, especially if you don't want a list of hard-coded exceptions. Related is if you have a lot of content from git repositories that are mirrored from different locations (GitHub, GitLab, etc.), all of which are showing the same content. Or if different sites are hosting versions of public domain texts. You don't want to dera…
Google knows instantly how much time you spend on a page and how quickly you return to the search results because it is a useless copy/paste page from SO.
So they could know if a code snippet was already X years old? And from where, originally. (Unless it got edited a lot but that's not the case here?)
Re: Ask HN: What are these low quality “code snippet” sites?
#160Earlier quoted context omitted.
There's also Personal Blocklist, which appends a small "block site.etc" under every google search result. If there is a site that is clogging up your search results, just click it and it's gone. https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/personal-bloc...
To me, this comment made it sound like this "block site.etc" was a feature that Personal Blocklist has and uBlacklist doesn't, but if I open the ublacklist page the first screenshot of the extension shows "Block this site" next to each search result. Is the "block site.etc" in Personal Blocklist different from the one in uBlacklist?
Based on the dialogue from the posters I was responding to, it seemed like uBlacklist would require some ongoing maintenance or memorization of input fields to work.
If it also offers a single-click permanent block of all sites in a domain from a Google search then that's just as cool, but that feature wasn't obvious from the conversation.