Live data from Hacker News

Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

news.ycombinator.com

111–120 of 221 posts

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#111

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Vancouver BC is magical and (IMO) one of the most beautiful cities in the world. In July & August, hands down the most beautiful place in the world, but still, 8 months of the year it's dark, wet and cold. If you're passionate about getting into the mountains or on the water and you can tolerate the rain, it's a wonderful place. Lots of wealthy people in Vancouver own boats to go sailing in the summer and a condo in…

> Vancouver is expensive if you're working for a local company & paid in CAD What explains such depressed wages for local developers? Aren't local companies interested in competing?

I want to know this too

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#113

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Madison Santa Fe Burlington

I've been putting together a list of walkable cities to potentially move to, and Madison and Burlington are on the list. Most of America is a 1/10, they're 6/10s, which isn't bad. All ranked by my totally arbitrary scale. But what I'm looking for is a 9+/10. Aspen, Colorado is a good example, but I would never be able to buy a house there as they start at $8 mil.

Btw, I also hear good things about Pittsburgh.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#115
Same place where I am - Bangalore.

Weather is the best - warm but not hot, cool but not cold. No extremes.

People from every state of India. So great food. Culturally very diverse and really a melting pot. Good sports/fitness scene and culture. Safe.

Locals are mostly fine with outsiders. In fact that’s the economy here other than IT. English (more) and Hindi (less) are the connecting tongues. Local language is not forced other than some isolated incidents.

Decent amount of open space. Very easy and quick access to the hills. And in a way to the sea too, but drive is longer. Easy connectivity to everywhere by train, road, and air.

Decently open and alive dating scene, though it gets way too hard in 30s.

I had played with the idea of moving to a small town or a rural area or a quaint hill station but due to overall poor infrastructure in India those places easily get ruled out as candidates of a sustained working place.

You don’t want to have total lack of social life, patchy Internet, and very absence of even half decent medical facilities where you live for long. So you got to stick to major cities in India.

Other cities in India simply don’t have most of what Bangalore offers (except traffic is really bad here; and metro is designed to be useless; and political atmosphere is rapidly sliding to the extreme right but that’s the entire country). I tried living abroad, didn’t work for me. So Bangalore it is.

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#116

Tokyo! Pros: - Safe almost everywhere even at night and generally very clean - Infinite amount of things to do, you'll never finish exploring new restaurants (with delicious food) and stores - International events happen there: conferences, concerts, etc. - Very walkable (including the metro), especially around city center - Reasonable housing prices - high, but comparable to cities in the US - Politeness is baked in…

Isn’t Kyoto the same but better?

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#117
New York

* most diverse and cosmopolitan English-speaking and relatively-free city in the world, by far

* compact with good public transit, creating an incredibly high points of interest per commute hour ratio - the best metric for measuring urban qol

* not the BEST tech/entrepreneurial communities, but still has very good ones, and is better rounded than the very top tier tech hubs: high quality art, design, games, music, publishing, fashion, etc scenes

Hon. mentions: Tokyo, LA

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#118

Might be the city I'm currently living in: Albuquerque, NM. It's very inexpensive, and sits at the foothills of the Sandia Mountains and Petroglyph National Park. It's almost always sunny, yet is rarely too hot for outdoor activities. As far as bike infrastructure goes it may just be in the top 10 for US cities. You almost need to go out of your way to not be an outdoorsy person here. It has a decent amount of restau…

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#119

Tokyo! Pros: - Safe almost everywhere even at night and generally very clean - Infinite amount of things to do, you'll never finish exploring new restaurants (with delicious food) and stores - International events happen there: conferences, concerts, etc. - Very walkable (including the metro), especially around city center - Reasonable housing prices - high, but comparable to cities in the US - Politeness is baked in…

[deleted]

Re: Ask HN: What's your ideal city in a 100% remote world?

#120
Thinking about my ideal place to live sends me into a spiral of conflicting requirements that ends up with the conclusion that any environment my simple human brain could think up will inevitably fail to satisfy somehow or feel like a static, boring utopia. I love nature and space but there is something about the change and pace of cities that is stimulating as well. The closest to how I’d want to live is probably like Mr. Miyagi with cool old architecture and space to tinker with old cars but nearby a city.
Post reply on HN