Viewing profile — ysnp
ysnp
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 28, 2021, 1:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 221
- Public activity
- 132 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ysnp
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49198303
Just to note Revolut are quite famously anti-security and GrapheneOS have had to work around attempts to ban it on a few occasions. You may have meant the swiss finance app Yuh or …
-
comment
Comment #48767953
Can Android OEMs, bundling Google Mobile Services for Android certification, choose different trust roots for verification? >The correct thing to complain about is requiring develo…
-
comment
Comment #48575255
Can you add CopperheadOS data 2014-2018 and AndroidHardening Project from 2018-2019?
-
comment
Comment #48573714
For what it's worth, strcat is the GrapheneOS founder so they will have a keen insight into current plans.
-
comment
Comment #48310180
Any promising mesh networks, radio networks or routing protocols worth looking into?
-
comment
Comment #48282070
It may be worth noting that GrapheneOS in most cases to date are not the initiators for conversations around extra device support. They do not control which mobile divisions and en…
-
comment
Comment #48281962
The details of the partnership are mostly disclosed in the joint announcements but GrapheneOS has no say or influence on Motorola's stock Android image and policy. The main objecti…
-
comment
Comment #48150846
I've not seen someone refer to a portion of GrapheneOS's mitigations as superficial and meaningless before. What might an OS with significant improvements to usable attack surface …
-
comment
Comment #48096187
They have commented elsewhere that any inclusion/exclusion criteria (if at all) should be transparent and collaboratively decided rather than arbitrary, monopolised or ineffectual/…
-
comment
Comment #48096135
The requirements are not particularly stringent. It is more an embarrassing show from the rest of the Android OEMs that they don't meet basic standards like timely security updates…
-
comment
Comment #47859617
From what I've read I understand it is more like: /e/OS (recipient of EU funding) and iodéOS are European projects that have not been singled out by the French government in smeari…
-
comment
Comment #47853865
There are a lot of judgemental comments here criticising Daniel's character, responses and handling of what was likely a very trying and stressful period in their life. Barely any …
-
comment
Comment #47852125
Phantom Secure is directly named as one of the parties Donaldson was dealing with, with others being suspected: > Donaldson tried to make a deal with Phantom Secure, which ultimate…
-
comment
Comment #47590738
It may be worth checking Motorola's OLED models in person (for example the Razr Fold, Razr Ultra and Signature) so see if their Flicker Prevention mode helps. I don't think any IPS…
-
comment
Comment #47590590
Having GrapheneOS preinstalled is an option they may discuss with Motorola. It is not the current plan. The current plan is that Motorola release their devices as normal, but some …
-
comment
Comment #47450360
GrapheneOS will support future Morotola phones that meet a subset of their requirements, rather than existing phones. Less likely to be budget lines for now.
-
comment
Comment #47402682
DNSSEC is one of very few topics where voices I respect on security seem completely opposed (WebPKI depends on DNS vs. DNS security does not matter). Is there any literature that d…
-
comment
Comment #47280776
Is the case that captures all RF still planned for the productised Baochip?
-
comment
Comment #47253119
Can anyone from Motorola confirm that the form submission and time delay requirements will be removed?
-
comment
Comment #47253033
Hi daneel, what would you like GrapheneOS to do while you develop your own formally verified, open hardware, open source firmware/OS baseband processor they can use? Sit on their h…
-
comment
Comment #47252885
Since ~2023 all Motorola phones with Snapdragon SoCs (the ones most likely to support MTE as needed by GrapheneOS first) have been larger or equal to 6.5" screens.
-
comment
Comment #47252804
The Google Pixel has first-class support for alternate OSes (not custom firmware like a Chromebook). The OEM has to go out of their way to support avb_custom_key as mentioned in ht…
-
comment
Comment #47237202
> are by incompetent/lazy/pressured devs who just throw in some library and don't even care that it leaks data to Google Even if I agreed with this statement, I don't understand wh…
-
comment
Comment #47235665
The partnership is for future devices, rather than existing devices.
-
comment
Comment #47222913
They said they have access to security previews/patches but I have missed that they have full AOSP access now? Do you have a link?